...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Rehabilitation Process and Outcome >Comparative Effects of Portable and Stationary Traction in the Management of Mechanical Neck Disorders
【24h】

Comparative Effects of Portable and Stationary Traction in the Management of Mechanical Neck Disorders

机译：便携式和固定牵引在机械性颈部疾病管理中的比较效果

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the therapeutic effects of portable and stationary tractions on treatment outcomes in patients with mechanical neck disorders (MNDs).Methods: Forty-one participants with MNDs were randomly assigned to either portable traction or stationary traction. Participants’ pain level, activity limitation, disability, and neck range of motion were measured before and after 6 weeks of intervention. Inferential statistics for comparing the treatment outcome involved paired t-test and two-way analysis of variance at P < 0.05.Results: The mean age of participants was 47.3 ± 10.5 years. After intervention, there were significant improvements in both groups. However, the portable traction group had significantly higher score on neck flexion than the stationary traction group at baseline (portable: 27.1 ± 6.0, stationary: 22.1 ± 6.8; P = 0.009) and after intervention (F-ratio = 15.0; P = 0.001).Conclusion: Inclusion of both portable and stationary tractions to usual physiotherapy provided comparable treatment outcomes in patients with MNDs.
机译：目的：本研究的目的是比较便携式和固定牵引对机械性颈部疾病（MND）患者的治疗效果。方法：将41名MND参与者随机分为便携式牵引或固定牵引。在干预6周之前和之后测量参与者的疼痛程度，活动受限，残疾和颈部活动范围。比较治疗结果的推论统计包括配对t检​​验和双向方差分析（P <0.05）。结果：参与者的平均年龄为47.3±10.5岁。干预后，两组均有显着改善。但是，便携式牵引组在基线时（便携式：27.1±6.0，固定：22.1±6.8; P = 0.009）和干预后（F比率= 15.0; P = 0.001）在颈部屈曲方面的得分明显高于固定式牵引组）结论：将便携式和固定牵引纳入常规理疗可以为MND患者提供可比的治疗效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号