• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Religions >Why Is There So Little Shia–Sunni Dialogue? Understanding the Deficit of Intra-Muslim Dialogue and Interreligious Peacemaking ? ?
【24h】

Why Is There So Little Shia–Sunni Dialogue? Understanding the Deficit of Intra-Muslim Dialogue and Interreligious Peacemaking ? ?

机译：为什么什叶派与逊尼派对话如此之少？了解回教内部对话和宗教间建立和平的缺陷？ ？

获取原文
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Despite a growth in fatalities resulting from organized violence with Shia–Sunni dimensions over the last two decades, in this study, we show, using existing data-bases on interreligious dialogue and peacemaking, that only less than two percent of the interreligious peacemaking organizations in the world are specialized in dialogue between Shias and Sunnis. Why is there so little institutionalized Shia–Sunni dialogue occurring when the need for such dialogue is evident? This study identifies and discusses this lack of institutional initiatives designed to prevent violence, manage conflicts and facilitate processes of intra-Muslim de-sectarianization. We discuss what we see as the three seemingly most obvious explanations—(1) the dismissal of the relevance of a Shia–Sunni cleavage, (2) the inappropriateness of the interreligious dialogue concept in the Muslim context, and (3) the substitution of institutional interreligious dialogue by other channels. Although we suggest that the third is the most potent explanation to pursue, we do not aim to provide a comprehensive explanation for the Shia–Sunni religious dialogue deficit. Instead, our aspiration is mainly to present and substantiate a puzzle that has not been identified or discussed in previous research. This can set an agenda for a reinvigorated research endeavor into the contemporary challenges for interreligious peacemaking.
机译：尽管在过去的二十年中，由于什叶派和逊尼派规模的有组织暴力造成的死亡人数增加，但在本研究中，我们显示，使用现有的基于宗教间对话和建立和平的数据库，只有不到百分之二的宗教间建立和平组织全世界都专门从事什叶派和逊尼派之间的对话。当明显需要进行这种制度化的什叶派与逊尼派对话时，为什么这样的对话很少发生？这项研究确定并讨论了缺乏旨在防止暴力，处理冲突和促进穆斯林内部反宗派化进程的体制举措的问题。我们讨论了看似最明显的三个解释：（1）消除了什叶派与逊尼派分裂的相关性;（2）在穆斯林语境中宗教间对话概念的不恰当性;（3）取代其他渠道的机构间宗教对话。尽管我们建议采用第三种解释是最有力的解释，但我们并不打算为什叶派与逊尼派的宗教对话不足提供全面的解释。相反，我们的愿望主要是提出和证实以前研究中尚未发现或讨论的难题。这可以为振兴研究宗教间建立和平的当代挑战设定议程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号