...
首页> 外文期刊>Religions >“Charming Sorcerers” or “Soldiers of Satan”? Witchcraft and Magic in the Eyes of Protestant/Calvinist Preachers in Early Modern Hungary ?
【24h】

“Charming Sorcerers” or “Soldiers of Satan”? Witchcraft and Magic in the Eyes of Protestant/Calvinist Preachers in Early Modern Hungary ?

机译:“迷人的巫师”还是“撒旦的士兵”?近代匈牙利新教徒/加尔文主义传教士眼中的巫术和魔法?

获取原文
           

摘要

The present study is the translation of Chapter 3 of the book of Ildikó Sz. Kristóf, entitled “?rd?gi mesterséget nem cselekedtem.” A boszorkányüld?zés társadalmi és kulturális háttere a kora újkori Debrecenben és Bihar vármegyében (“I have not done any diabolic deeds.” The Social and Cultural Foundation of Witch-Hunting in Early Modern Debrecen and Bihar County) published in Debrecen, Hungary in 1998. The book examined the witch-hunting in Bihar county and its largest city, the headquarters of the Calvinist church in Eastern Hungary between 1575 and 1766. During this period, 217 trials were conducted against 303 accused, and the book explored the social and religious foundations of the accusations. The witch-hunts in Bihar county were of rather small size (1–3 accused per annum) and intensity. A possible explanation for this relative mildness could be provided by a complex consideration of legal, religious, and local social circumstances. Chapter 3, published here in English, discusses Hungarian Calvinist demonology which remained rather sceptical about the concepts of diabolical witchcraft (e.g., the “covenant” or pact with the devil, the witches’ attendance at regular meetings (sabbath), etc.) throughout the early modern era. The author has studied several Calvinist treatises of theology published between the late 16th and the early 18th century by the printing press of Debrecen, those, for example, of Péter Mélius (1562), Tamás Félegyházi (1579), Péter Margitai Láni (1617), János Kecskeméti Alexis (1621), Mátyás Nógrádi (1651), Johannes Mediomontanus (1656), Pál Csehi (1656), István Diószegi Kis (1679; 1681), Gellért Kabai Bodor (1678) and Imre Pápai Páriz (1719). According to her findings, Calvinist demonology, although regarded the wordly interventions of the devil of limited scope (excepting, perhaps, the Puritans of the 1650s/1680s), urged the expurgation of the various forms of everyday magic from urban and village life. The suspicion of witchcraft fell especially on the practitioners of benevolent magic (popular healers/”wise women”, midwives, fortune-tellers, etc.) who were presumed to challenge and offend divine providence. The official religious considerations sometimes seem to have coincided with folk beliefs and explanations of misfortune concerning, among others, the plague epidemic in which witchcraft played an important role.
机译:本研究是IldikóSz书第3章的翻译。克里斯托夫(Kristóf),题为“?rd?gimesterségetnem cselekedtem”。 Boszorkányüld?zéstársadalmiéskulturálishátterea koraújkoriDebrecenbenésBiharvármegyében(“我还没有做过任何分解代谢的事。”《巫婆狩猎的社会和文化基金会》,1998年在匈牙利德布勒森和比哈尔郡的Debrecen出版,1998年出版)该书研究了比哈尔县及其最大城市,匈牙利东部加尔文教派教堂的总部在1575年至1766年之间的狩猎女巫。在此期间,对303名被告进行了217次审判,并探讨了社会和宗教信仰。指控的基础。比哈尔县的女巫狩猎活动规模很小(每年被指控1–3个),而且强度很高。可以通过对法律,宗教和当地社会环境的综合考虑来提供这种相对温和的解释。第3章以英文出版,讨论了匈牙利加尔文主义的恶魔学,该恶魔对恶魔般的巫术概念(例如与魔鬼的盟约或契约,女巫参加例行会议(安息日)等等)仍然持怀疑态度。早期的现代时代。作者研究了德布勒森(Debrecen)印刷厂在16世纪末至18世纪初出版的加尔文主义神学论着,例如佩特·梅利乌斯(1562),塔玛斯·费莱吉哈兹(1579),佩特·马尔吉泰·兰尼(1617) ,亚历克西斯(JánosKecskemétiAlexis)(1621),马蒂亚斯·诺格拉迪(MátyásNógrádi)(1651),约翰内斯·梅迪蒙蒙塔努斯(Johannes Mediomontanus)(1656),帕尔切塞(1656),伊斯特万·迪奥斯吉吉(IstvánDiószegiKis)(1679; 1681),盖勒特·卡拜·博多(GellértKabai Bodor)(1678)和伊姆雷·帕派(ImrePápaiPápai)(17)。根据她的发现,加尔文主义的恶魔学,尽管认为对范围有限的恶魔(也许是1650年代/ 1680年代的清教徒)进行了言语干预,但还是敦促消除城市和乡村生活中各种形式的日常魔术。对巫术的怀疑尤其落在那些被认为挑战并冒犯上帝天意的仁慈魔术师(受欢迎的医者/“智者”,助产士,算命者等)身上。官方的宗教考虑有时似乎与民间信仰和不幸的解释相吻合,其中包括关于瘟疫的流行,巫术在其中起到了重要的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号