...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte >DETERMINA??O DO LIMIAR GLICêMICO INDIVIDUAL COM O USO DE GLICOSíMETRO PORTáTIL DE FARMáCIADETERMINACIóN DEL UMBRAL GLUCéMICO INDIVIDUAL CON EL USO DE GLUCóMETRO PORTáTIL DE FARMACIA
【24h】

DETERMINA??O DO LIMIAR GLICêMICO INDIVIDUAL COM O USO DE GLICOSíMETRO PORTáTIL DE FARMáCIADETERMINACIóN DEL UMBRAL GLUCéMICO INDIVIDUAL CON EL USO DE GLUCóMETRO PORTáTIL DE FARMACIA

机译：通过使用便携式药典血糖仪确定个体血糖极限通过使用便携式药丸血糖仪确定个体血糖阈值

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Introduction The individual glucose threshold (IGT) has been used to estimate the anaerobic threshold with low-cost analyses and shorter times. However, the reliability of the glycemic analysis using a portable pharmacy glucose meter has received little attention. Objective To identify the IGT using a portable glucose meter and to compare it with the ventilatory threshold (VT). Methods Fourteen active, healthy men (25.9 ± 3.2 years; %BF = 17.9 ± 3.7%) performed an incremental treadmill test. The anaerobic threshold was identified by two different methods: (1) IGT, corresponding to the intensity of the lowest glucose value during the test; and (2) VT, corresponding to the break in linearity of the ventilation curve and an increase in the respiratory oxygen equivalent, without an equivalent increase in carbon dioxide. Results There were significant differences between VT (9.9 ± 1.2 km/h) and IGT (9.5 ± 1/1 km/h), corresponding to 75.4 ± 9.2 and 72.5 ± 10.4 %VO 2max , respectively. The methods presented high correlation (r = 0.82, p = 0.002) and the Bland-Altman technique showed agreement between IGT and VT, with a mean difference of 0.5 km/h. Conclusion It was possible to determine the intensity of IGT by the glycemic response in the incremental test using a portable glucose meter. The IGT underestimated the intensity of VT by approximately 0.5 km/h, but with a high correlation and agreement between them. Level of evidence III, Case-Controle Study.
机译：简介个体葡萄糖阈值（IGT）已用于通过低成本分析和较短时间来估算无氧阈值。但是，使用便携式药房血糖仪进行血糖分析的可靠性很少受到关注。目的使用便携式血糖仪识别IGT，并将其与通气阈值（VT）进行比较。方法14名活跃，健康的男性（25.9±3.2岁;％BF = 17.9±3.7％）进行了跑步机增量测试。厌氧阈值通过两种不同的方法确定：（1）IGT，对应于测试过程中最低葡萄糖值的强度; （2）VT，对应于通气曲线线性的折断和呼吸氧当量的增加，而二氧化碳的当量没有增加。结果VT（9.9±1.2 km / h）和IGT（9.5±1/1 km / h）之间存在显着差异，分别对应于75.4±9.2和72.5±10.4％VO 2max。这些方法具有较高的相关性（r = 0.82，p = 0.002），而Bland-Altman技术显示了IGT和VT之间的一致性，平均差为0.5 km / h。结论在便携式血糖仪的增量试验中，通过血糖反应可以确定IGT的强度。 IGT低估了VT的强度约0.5 km / h，但它们之间具有高度相关性和一致性。证据水平III，病例对照研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号