• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Risk Governance & Control: Financial Markets & Institutions >LIBERTY THROUGH LIMITS: THE BILL OF RIGHTS AS LIMITED GOVERNMENT PROVISIONS
【24h】

LIBERTY THROUGH LIMITS: THE BILL OF RIGHTS AS LIMITED GOVERNMENT PROVISIONS

机译：不受限制的自由：作为有限政府规定的权利法案

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Under the modern view, individual autonomy has become the primary if not exclusive focus of the Bill of Rights. But the Bill of Rights came about not because of a desire to preserve individual autonomy, nor to insulate the individual from the democratic community. The impetus for the Bill of Rights arose from the same set of concerns that motivated the original Constitution. These concerns involved creating the appropriate structures so as to keep the new central government in check. The Bill of Rights sought to further ensure that the federal government would have limited power and operate in a limited role. Not only does this limited government model coincide with the original intent underlying the Bill of Rights, but it also provides for a more objective and manageable application. Under an individual autonomy view of the Bill of Rights, courts must define the ingredients necessary for such autonomy. However, this endeavor is fraught with ambiguity, and courts must constantly pit the individual against democratic society. But under the limited government model, the judicial role is more objective. Instead of trying to define an ambiguous individual autonomy, courts simply need to focus on whether a particular right is needed so as to maintain limited government. In addition, the limited government model does not put the Bill of Rights in conflict with democratic society. Instead, it just uses the Bill of Rights to maintain a check on government, just as the original Constitution seeks to do.
机译：在现代观点下，个人自治已成为人权法案的主要重点，即使不是排他性的重点。但是，《人权法案》的产生并不是出于维护个人自主权或将个人与民主社会隔离的愿望。 《人权法案》的推动力源于原《宪法》所激发的一系列关注。这些问题涉及建立适当的结构，以控制新的中央政府。人权法案试图进一步确保联邦政府的权力有限，作用有限。这种有限的政府模式不仅与人权法案的初衷相吻合，而且还提供了更为客观和可管理的应用。根据《权利法案》的个人自治观点，法院必须确定实现这种自治所必需的要素。但是，这种努力充满歧义，法院必须不断使个人与民主社会抗争。但是在有限的政府模式下，司法角色更加客观。法院不必试图定义模棱两可的个人自治，而只需要关注是否需要一项特定权利，以维持有限的政府。此外，有限的政府模式不会使《人权法案》与民主社会发生冲突。取而代之的是，它只使用《权利法案》对政府进行检查，就像原始《宪法》所寻求的那样。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号