• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Revista de Administrao Pública >Movilidad de políticas por comparación: procesos de urbanización, repetición de instancias y topologías
【24h】

Movilidad de políticas por comparación: procesos de urbanización, repetición de instancias y topologías

机译：比较中的政策流动性：城市化过程，实例和拓扑的重复

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Following on from calls to reformat comparative urban methods to support global urban studies, this paper draws inspiration from policy mobilities to explore how the genetic interconnectedness of urban processes and outcomes can be mobilised methodologically to critique and extend concepts in urban theory through comparison. What might be the scope and tactics for a practice of comparison through connections, which can start anywhere and build comparisons and analytical insights across a very great diversity of urban experiences? This paper explores three possible ways to take this forward. Firstly, tracing a specific connection, such as a policy link, from one context to another or across a number of different contexts contributes to understanding specific urbanization processes. Secondly, following connections brings into view the range and variety of processes and outcomes in different contexts. In the highly transnationalised world of urban policy this method potentially links a very wide variety of diverse urban contexts and draws attention to a multiplicity of repeated instances of urban forms. Finally, the paper considers the potential to work with the array of transnational processes shaping distinctive policy outcomes and development paths as they come together in one specific place - to explore how “elsewhere” is folded in to localised growth paths. Thus, comparative practices could follow policy mobilities to explore the potential of a more topological imagination of thinking across different contexts, and bringing a diversity of urban contexts into analytical conversation. Along these lines, the invention of concepts and understandings of the urban might emerge anywhere, and perhaps find wider relevance across different situations. Following the trajectories of policy mobilities is thus not only a pathway to inventing new methods but also potentially new grounds for theorizing the urban.
机译：在呼吁改革比较城市方法以支持全球城市研究的呼吁之后，本文从政策动员中汲取了灵感，以探索如何通过方法论来动员城市过程和结果之间的遗传联系以批判和扩展城市理论中的概念。通过联系进行比较的实践的范围和策略是什么，这种联系可以从任何地方开始，并且可以在非常丰富的城市经验中建立比较和分析见解？本文探索了三种可能的方法来实现这一目标。首先，从一个环境到另一个环境或在许多不同环境中追踪特定的联系，例如政策链接，有助于理解特定的城市化过程。其次，通过以下联系可以看到不同情况下流程和结果的范围和多样性。在高度跨国化的城市政策世界中，这种方法可能将非常多种多样的城市环境联系起来，并引起人们对城市形式重复实例的关注。最后，本文考虑了在一系列特殊过程中形成独特的政策成果和发展路径的跨国过程的潜力，以探讨“其他地方”如何融入本地化增长路径。因此，比较实践可以遵循政策动向，以探索在不同情境中进行更拓扑的思维想象的潜力，并将各种城市情境引入分析性对话。沿着这些思路，城市概念和理解的发明可能出现在任何地方，并且可能在不同情况下具有更广泛的相关性。因此，遵循政策动向的轨迹不仅是发明新方法的途径，而且还是城市理论化的潜在新依据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号