• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Open Journal of Philosophy >Passive Knowledge: How to Make Sense of Kant’s A Priori——Or How Not to Be “Too Busily Subsuming”
【24h】

Passive Knowledge: How to Make Sense of Kant’s A Priori——Or How Not to Be “Too Busily Subsuming”

机译：被动知识：如何理解康德的先验知识，或者如何不“太忙于服从”

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Subjectivists, taking the “collapse” of the observation-interpretation contrast much too seriously, are led to imagine that even perceptual knowledge is active. And therefore subject dependent. Turning the tables on this popular trend, I argue that even conceptual knowledge is passive. Kant’s epistemology is conceptual. But if also active, then incoherent. If synthetic a priori truths are to follow upon our mental activity, they were neither true nor, far less, a priori before that activity. “A priori” and “active” are contradictory attributes of knowledge. As, indeed, are “a priori” and “subject-dependent” to begin with. Nothing a priori can be dependent on anything except itself, and least of all on the human subject. Kant does consider the active aspect of thought. The difference is that for him the more active it becomes, the less it is to be trusted. For we are no longer in the province of the Understanding, and its necessary truths, but in the realm of Pure Reason and its dialectical antinomies. Cognition activists who take a liking to Kant have simply mistaken Reason for the Understanding. And Reason is to Kant “the seat of all transcendental illusion”.
机译：主观主义者过于看重观察-解释对比的“崩溃”，导致想象甚至知觉知识是活跃的。因此，取决于主体。扭转这种流行趋势，我认为即使是概念性知识也是被动的。康德的认识论是概念性的。但是如果还活跃的话，那就是不连贯的。如果综合的先验真理要遵循我们的精神活动，那么它们既不是真实的，也不是，不是更重要的，不是该活动之前的先验真理。 “先验”和“主动”是知识的矛盾属性。的确是从“先验”和“主体依赖”开始的。先验条件不能依赖任何东西，除了它本身，而且至少要依赖人类。康德确实考虑了思想的积极方面。不同之处在于，对于他来说，活动越活跃，被信任就越少。因为我们不再处在谅解及其必要真理的领域，而是处在“纯粹理性”及其辩证对立领域。喜欢康德的认知活动家只是误解了理解的理由。理智是康德“所有超验幻觉的所在地”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号