...
首页> 外文期刊>Online Journal of Health Ethics >Commentary: Differential Human Life Value Perception, Guatemala Experiment and Bioethics
【24h】

Commentary: Differential Human Life Value Perception, Guatemala Experiment and Bioethics

机译:评论:差异化的人类生命价值观念,危地马拉实验和生物伦理

获取原文
           

摘要

The objective of this opinionated paper is to reflect on the potential of perceptions of different values of human life in influencing ethics violations particularly in health and medical research. It is posited that sometimes members of the research community perceive their own lives as being more precious than other lives. The factor discussed for bioethical violations is the perception of different levels of importance of human lives of people of different races, cultures, regions, countries or ethnic origins in the minds of fellow humans. The experiments carried out on Jews in Nazi camps, African-American people in The Tuskegee experiment, and Guatemalans in The Guatemala Syphilis experiment point to this perception. More often than not, the learned medical scientists know what morally sound medical research is, as is brought forward by an example of Guatemala study; however, sometimes they resort to bioethical violations presumably influenced by their perception of value for other human lives. The researchers for clinical or experimental trials are often drawn to inhabitants of underdeveloped or developing nations as they perceive that if in case there is any harm to the clinical subjects’ health, there won’t be any big payouts; as the worth of those subjects is less than clinical subjects in a developed country. In some of the unethical human experimentations, the affected populations were vulnerable due to their social or economic conditions: being war personnel, mentally depressed or being inmates in prisons. This vulnerability of the subjects makes the researcher throw away the concept of ‘equality in the value of human life’. It is the opinion of the author that as long as this mentality of different values of human life persists, it will have the potential to feed into ethical violations in spite of regulations or laws.
机译:这篇有观点的论文的目的是反思人们对不同生命价值观念的潜在影响,尤其是在健康和医学研究中,这可能会影响到违反道德的行为。据推测,有时研究界的成员认为自己的生活比其他生活更宝贵。讨论的违反生物伦理的因素是,在同胞的心中,不同种族,文化,地区,国家或种族血统的人们对人生的重要性有不同的认识。在纳粹集中营的犹太人,在图斯克吉实验中的非洲裔美国人以及在危地马拉梅毒实验中的危地马拉人进行的实验都表明了这种看法。正如危地马拉研究的一个例子所证明的那样,博学多才的医学家通常知道什么是道义上的医学研究。然而,有时他们诉诸于违反生物伦理的行为,大概是由于他们对他人生命的价值观念的影响。用于临床或实验研究的研究人员通常被欠发达国家或发展中国家的居民所吸引,因为他们认为,如果对临床受试者的健康造成任何伤害,就不会有任何可观的收益。因为这些受试者的价值低于发达国家的临床受试者。在一些不道德的人类实验中,受灾人群由于其社会或经济状况而脆弱:身为战争人员,精神抑郁者或监狱中的囚犯。研究对象的这种脆弱性使研究人员抛弃了“人类生活价值平等”的概念。作者认为,只要人类生活中各种价值观念持续下去,尽管有法规或法律,也有可能助长道德上的侵犯。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号