首页> 外文期刊>Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine >Trans-osseous versus Anchor Repair of Acute Patellar Tendon Ruptures
【24h】

Trans-osseous versus Anchor Repair of Acute Patellar Tendon Ruptures

机译:-骨肌腱断裂的经骨与锚固修复

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives: Patellar tendon ruptures are relatively uncommon injuries. They require prompt diagnosis and surgical repair to restore the extensor mechanism of the knee. The gold standard procedure is a suture repair of the tendon, passed through trans-osseous tunnels, and tying of the sutures on the superior pole of the patella. Suture anchors have gained popularity with a recent cadaveric study demonstrating significantly less gap formation during cyclic loading and significantly higher ultimate failure loads. We present the largest series of patellar tendon repairs and compare the clinical outcomes and complications of trans-osseous (TO) and anchor (A) repair types. Methods: All patients who underwent a primary repair of a traumatic patellar tendon rupture within 45 days of injury, between 2007 and 2016, were retrospectively reviewed. Surgeries were performed at a multi-surgeon (114 surgeons), multi-center (13 centers) community-based integrated health care system. Patients with prior knee surgery, use of graft, patellar debridement for tendonitis, inferior pole avulsion fracture, concurrent knee surgery with other procedures were excluded. Patient demographic information, repair type, complications, and time from surgery to release from medical care were recorded. Results: 361 patients (374 knees) met our inclusion criteria. 13 had bilateral repairs during our study period and an additional 8 had a contralateral repair prior to our study period, for a bilateral incidence at 5.8%. The average age was 39.8 years (9 to 86 years). There were 341 males (94.5%). The most common mechanism of injury was basketball (47%), fall (19.5%), football (5.0%), and soccer (4.8%). Average time from injury to surgery was 6.3 days (range: 1- 45 days). There were 321 TO and 53 A repairs. There was no significant difference in the mean age (P=0.27), gender (P=0.79), tourniquet time (P=0.93), or BMI (P=0.78) between the two groups. There was a significant difference in re-rupture between (24 of 321) TO (7.5%) and (0 of 53) A (0%) (P=0.034). Using logistic regression, we found that TO had 3.244 times the odds of re-operation as those with A (95% CI: 0.757, 13.895. p-value: 0.1129) but did not reach signficance. The infection rate was 7.5% for A and 1.6% for TO (P= 0.160). There was no difference in time to release from medical care, 18.4 weeks for and 17.1 weeks (P=0.92). Conclusion: Compared to Anchors, primary repair of patellar tendon ruptures with trans-osseous repair had a significantly higher re-rupture rate, but there was no difference in re-operation rate, infection, or release from medical care.
机译:目的:Pat骨肌腱断裂是相对罕见的损伤。他们需要及时诊断和手术修复,以恢复膝盖的伸肌机制。黄金标准手术是对腱的缝合线修复,穿过骨桥,然后将缝合线绑在pat骨上极上。最近的尸体研究表明,缝线锚越来越受欢迎,这表明循环荷载作用下缝隙的形成明显减少,而最终破坏荷载则明显更高。我们介绍了最大的tend骨腱修复系列,并比较了经骨(TO)和锚(A)修复类型的临床结果和并发症。方法:回顾性分析2007年至2016年间在45骨损伤后45天内进行了一次pa骨外伤的首次修复的所有患者。手术是在多名外科医生(114名外科医生),多中心(13个中心)基于社区的综合医疗保健系统中进行的。既往曾进行过膝关节手术,使用移植物、,肌清创术治疗肌腱炎,下极撕脱性骨折,同时进行其他手术的膝关节置换术患者。记录患者的人口统计信息,修复类型,并发症以及从手术到退房的时间。结果:361名患者(374膝)符合我们的纳入标准。在我们的研究期间,有13例进行了双侧修复,在我们的研究期之前,还有8例进行了对侧修复,双侧发生率为5.8%。平均年龄为39.8岁(9至86岁)。有341例男性(94.5%)。最常见的伤害机制是篮球(47%),摔倒(19.5%),足球(5.0%)和足球(4.8%)。从受伤到手术的平均时间为6.3天(范围:1-45天)。进行了321 TO和53 A维修。两组的平均年龄(P = 0.27),性别(P = 0.79),止血带时间(P = 0.93)或BMI(P = 0.78)没有显着差异。 (321中的24)TO(7.5%)与(53中的0)A(0%)之间的再破裂存在显着差异(P = 0.034)。使用逻辑回归分析,我们发现TO的再手术几率是A者的3.244倍(95%CI:0.757,13.895。p值:0.1129),但未达到显着性水平。 A的感染率为7.5%,TO的感染率为1.6%(P = 0.160)。离开医疗的时间无差异,分别为18.4周和17.1周(P = 0.92)。结论:与锚钉相比,primary骨肌腱断裂的初次修复与经骨骨修复具有更高的再破裂率,但再手术率,感染或从医疗中释放没有差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号