• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine >Analysis of Publication Trends for the 2011-2015 American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine Annual Meeting Abstracts
【24h】

Analysis of Publication Trends for the 2011-2015 American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine Annual Meeting Abstracts

机译：2011-2015年美国骨科学会运动医学年会摘要的出版趋势分析

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background: Academic conferences are sources of novel research that can influence clinical decision making. Orthopaedic surgery maintains a relatively high rate of publication compared with other surgical subspecialties, and sports medicine conferences hold an even higher rate within the subspecialty. The American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM) annual meetings have been shown to have among the highest rates of publication for accepted abstracts. Purpose: To determine differences between 2-year publication rates of poster and podium abstracts accepted into the AOSSM annual meetings and identify factors associated with publication. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: The AOSSM archives were queried for all accepted poster and podium presentations for annual meetings from 2011 through 2015. Google Scholar and MEDLINE databases were used to determine which abstracts transitioned into journal articles. Publication rates were compared based on publication 2 years following presentation. Logistic regression was performed to demonstrate which variables were most correlated with successful publication. Data on publication impact factor and number of citations were collected by use of the InCites database. Results: Of 628 abstracts accepted during this period, 265 were poster presentations and 363 were podium presentations. Overall, 44.7% of abstracts presented were accepted into peer-reviewed journals within 2 years of presentation. No statistical difference was found between poster and podium presentations for journal publication ( P = .328). Poster presentations were published in journals with statistically lower impact factor ( P = .005) and had a statistically lower number of citations ( P & .001) compared with podium presentations. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that only number of authors was correlated with publication ( P = .003). Conclusion: Podium and poster presentations accepted into AOSSM conferences had equal rates of publication within 2 years and should influence decision making equally. The relative impact of podium presentations appeared to be greater, which suggests that the AOSSM selects podium presentations that will have greater clinical impact. Increasing number of coauthors was the only factor found to be correlated with publication.
机译：背景：学术会议是可以影响临床决策的新颖研究的来源。与其他外科专科相比，整形外科的发表率较高，而运动医学会议在该专科内的发布率甚至更高。美国运动医学骨科学会（AOSSM）年度会议已被证明是公认摘要的最高发表率。目的：确定AOSSM年度会议接受的海报和讲台摘要的2年出版率之间的差异，并确定与出版相关的因素。研究设计：横断面研究。方法：从AOSSM档案库中查询所有2011年至2015年年度会议接受的海报和讲台介绍。使用Google Scholar和MEDLINE数据库确定哪些摘要已转换为期刊文章。根据发表后2年的发表率比较发表率。进行逻辑回归以证明哪些变量与成功发表最相关。利用InCites数据库收集有关出版物影响因子和引用次数的数据。结果：在此期间接受的628篇摘要中，有265篇为海报展示，有363篇为领奖台演讲。总体而言，在发表后的两年内，所提交摘要的44.7％被同行评审期刊接受。在发表期刊的海报和讲台上，没有发现统计学差异（P = 0.328）。与讲台上的演讲相比，海报上的演讲发表在期刊上的影响因子在统计学上较低（P = .005），并且被引用的次数在统计学上也较低（P <.001）。多变量逻辑回归分析表明，只有作者人数与出版物相关（P = .003）。结论：AOSSM会议接受的讲台和海报展示在2年内具有相同的发表率，并且应同样影响决策。讲台演讲的相对影响似乎更大，这表明AOSSM选择的讲台演讲将产生更大的临床影响。共同作者人数的增加是唯一与出版相关的因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号