...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>SAGE Open >Open Access, Megajournals, and MOOCs: On the Political Economy of Academic Unbundling
【24h】

Open Access, Megajournals, and MOOCs: On the Political Economy of Academic Unbundling

机译：开放获取，大型期刊和MOOC：学术捆绑的政治经济学

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The development of a??opena?? academic content has been strongly embraced and promoted by many advocates, analysts, stakeholders, and reformers in the sector of higher education and academic publishing. The two most well-known developments are open access scholarly publishing and Massive Online Open Courses (MOOCs), each of which are connected to disruptive innovations enabled by new technologies. Support for these new modes of exchanging knowledge is linked to the expectation that they will promote a number of public interest benefits, including widening the impact, productivity, and format of academic work; reforming higher education and scholarly publishing markets; and relieving some of the cost pressures in academia. This article examines the rapid emergence of policy initiatives in the United Kingdom and the United States to promote open content and to bring about a new relationship between the market and the academic commons. In doing so, I examine controversial forms of academic unbundling such as open access megajournals and MOOCs and place each in the context of the heightened emphasis on productivity and impact in new regulatory regimes in the area of higher education.
机译：开发“ opena”高等教育和学术出版领域的许多倡导者，分析家，利益相关者和改革者都强烈拥护和推广学术内容。两个最著名的发展是开放获取学术出版和大规模在线开放课程（MOOC），每一个都与新技术带来的颠覆性创新相关。对这些新的知识交流方式的支持与期望它们将促进许多公共利益有关，包括扩大影响，提高生产力和学术工作的形式。改革高等教育和学术出版市场;并减轻了学术界的一些成本压力。本文考察了英国和美国为促进开放内容以及在市场与学术界之间建立新关系而迅速采取的政策措施。在此过程中，我研究了有争议的学术捆绑形式，例如开放式大型期刊和MOOC，并将每种形式置于对生产率的重视以及对高等教育领域新监管制度的影响的背景下。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号