...
首页> 外文期刊>Sao Paulo Medical Journal >Comparison of lactate values obtained from different sites and their clinical significance in patients with severe sepsis
【24h】

Comparison of lactate values obtained from different sites and their clinical significance in patients with severe sepsis

机译:严重脓毒症患者不同部位乳酸值的比较及其临床意义

获取原文
           

摘要

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: The ideal site for lactate collection has not been clearly established. This study aimed to evaluate associations between lactate levels in arterial blood (Lart), peripheral venous blood (Lper) and central venous blood (Lcen) in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional analytical study in an tertiary university hospital. METHOD: Samples from patients with a central venous catheter and from healthy volunteers (control group) were collected. Blood was drawn simultaneously for measurements of Lart, Lper and Lcen, and the first sample was collected less than 24 hours after the onset of organ dysfunction. The results were analyzed using Pearson correlation, Bland-Altman and McNemar tests. RESULTS: A total of 238 samples were collected from 32 patients. The correlation results were r = 0.79 (P < 0.0001) for Lart/Lper and r = 0.84 (P < 0.0001) for Lart/Lcen. Bland-Altman showed large limits of agreement: -3.2 ± 4.9 (-12.8 to 6.4) and -0.8 ± 5.9 (-12.5 to 10.8), for Lper and Lcen respectively. In the control group, there was greater correlation (r = 0.9009, P = 0.0004) and agreement: -0.7 ± 1.2 (-3.1 to 1.7). Regarding clinical intervention, there was good agreement between Lart/Lcen (96.3%; three disagreements), with worst results for Lart/Lper (87.0%) with 10 cases of disagreement (P = 0.04). In eight patients (80.0%) Lper was higher than Lart. CONCLUSION: Lcen, and not Lper, can replace Lart with good correlation and clinical agreement. Lper tends to overestimate Lart, thus leading to unnecessary therapeutic interventions
机译:背景与目的:尚未明确建立理想的乳酸收集场所。这项研究旨在评估严重脓毒症或败血性休克患者的动脉血(Lart),外周静脉血(Lper)和中心静脉血(Lcen)中乳酸水平之间的关联。设计与设置:在一家三级大学医院进行的横断面分析研究。方法:收集中央静脉导管患者和健康志愿者(对照组)的样本。同时抽血以测量Lart,Lper和Lcen,在器官功能障碍发作后不到24小时收集第一个样品。使用Pearson相关,Bland-Altman和McNemar检验分析结果。结果:从32例患者中总共收集了238个样本。相关结果对于Lart / Lper为r = 0.79(P <0.0001),对于Lart / Lcen为r = 0.84(P <0.0001)。 Bland-Altman表现出较大的一致性限制:Lper和Lcen分别为-3.2±4.9(-12.8至6.4)和-0.8±5.9(-12.5至10.8)。在对照组中,相关性更大(r = 0.9009,P = 0.0004),一致性:-0.7±1.2(-3.1至1.7)。在临床干预方面,Lart / Lcen之间达成了良好的共识(96.3%;三项分歧),Lart / Lper的结果最差(87.0%),其中有10项分歧(P = 0.04)。在八名患者中(80.0%)Lper高于Lart。结论:Lcen,而不是Lper,可以以良好的相关性和临床一致性替代Lart。 Lper倾向于高估Lart,从而导致不必要的治疗干预

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号