...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Sao Paulo Medical Journal >What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about new practices on integrative medicine?
【24h】

What do Cochrane systematic reviews say about new practices on integrative medicine?

机译：Cochrane系统评价对中西医结合的新实践怎么说？

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: This study identified and summarized all Cochrane systematic reviews (SRs) on the effects of ten integrative practices that were recently added to the Brazilian public healthcare system (SUS). DESIGN AND SETTING: Review of systematic reviews, conducted in the Discipline of Evidence-Based Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina (EPM), Universidade Federal de S?o Paulo (Unifesp). METHODS: Review of Cochrane SRs on the following interventions were identified, summarized and critically assessed: apitherapy, aromatherapy, bioenergetics, family constellation, flower therapy, chromotherapy, geotherapy, hypnotherapy, hand imposition or ozone therapy. RESULTS: We included a total of 16 SRs: 4 on apitherapy, 4 on aromatherapy, 6 on hypnotherapy and 2 on ozone therapy. No Cochrane SR was found regarding bioenergetics, family constellation, chromotherapy, clay therapy, flower therapy or hand imposition. The only high-quality evidence was in relation to the potential benefit of apitherapy, specifically regarding some benefits from honey dressings for partial healing of burn wounds, for reduction of coughing among children with acute coughs and for preventing allergic reactions to insect stings. CONCLUSION: Except for some specific uses of apitherapy (honey for burn wounds and for acute coughs and bee venom for allergic reactions to insect stings), the use of ten integrative practices that have recently been incorporated into SUS does not seem to be supported by evidence from Cochrane SRs.
机译：摘要背景：这项研究确定并总结了所有最近对巴西公共卫生保健系统（SUS）添加的十种综合实践的效果的所有Cochrane系统评价（SR）。设计与环境：系统评价的回顾，在循证医学学科，Escola Paulista de Medicina（EPM），Universidade Federal S？o Paulo（Unifesp）进行。方法：对Cochrane SR的以下干预措施进行了鉴定，总结和严格评估：蜂疗，芳香疗法，生物能学，家庭星座，花卉疗法，色光疗法，地球疗法，催眠疗法，手法或臭氧疗法。结果：我们总共纳入了16个SR：api疗法4个，芳香疗法4个，催眠疗法6个和臭氧疗法2个。在生物能学，家庭星座，色光疗法，黏土疗法，花卉疗法或手部施加方面，未发现Cochrane SR。唯一高质量的证据是关于蜂疗的潜在好处，特别是蜂蜜敷料可部分治愈烧伤创面，减少急性咳嗽儿童的咳嗽并防止对昆虫st伤的过敏反应。结论：除了蜂疗的一些特定用途（用于烧伤创面，用于急性咳嗽的蜂蜜和用于对昆虫ing的过敏反应的蜂毒）之外，最近已被纳入SUS的十种综合措施的使用似乎没有证据支持。来自Cochrane SR。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号