...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia >Safety and reliability of the sealing cuff pressure of the Microcuff pediatric tracheal tube for prevention of post-extubation morbidity in children: A comparative study
【24h】

Safety and reliability of the sealing cuff pressure of the Microcuff pediatric tracheal tube for prevention of post-extubation morbidity in children: A comparative study

机译：微型袖带小儿气管导管密封袖带压力预防儿童拔管后发病的安全性和可靠性：一项比较研究

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Objectives: The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sealing pressure as an inflation technique of the Microcuff pediatric tracheal cuffed tube. Materials and Methods: A total of 60 children were enrolled in this study. After induction of anesthesia and intubation with Microcuff pediatric tracheal tube, patients were randomly assigned, to one of the three groups. Control group ( n = 20) the cuff was inflated to a cuff pressure of 20 cm H2O; sealing group ( n = 20) the cuff was inflated to prevent the air leak at peak airway pressure of 20 cm H2O and the finger group ( n = 20) the cuff was inflated to a suitable pressure using the finger estimation. Tracheal leak, incidence and severity of post-extubation cough, stridor, sore throat and hoarseness were recorded. Results: The cuff pressure as well as the volume of air to fill the cuff was significantly low in the sealing group when compared with the control group ( P 2O, free general anesthesia using Microcuff pediatric tracheal tub, sealing cuff pressure is safer than finger palpation technique regarding post-extubation morbidities and more reliable than recommended safe pressure in prevention of the air leak.
机译：目的：本研究的目的是评估密封压力作为Microcuff儿科气管袖带管充气技术的有效性和安全性。材料和方法：共有60名儿童参加了这项研究。在用Microcuff儿科气管插管麻醉和插管后，将患者随机分为三组之一。对照组（n = 20），将袖带充气至20 cm H 2 O的袖带压力。密封组（n = 20）将袖带充气，以防止在最大气道压力为20 cm H 2 时漏气;手指组（n = 20），将袖带充气至合适的压力使用手指估计。记录气管渗漏，拔管后咳嗽，喘鸣，喉咙痛和声音嘶哑的发生率和严重程度。结果：与对照组相比，密封组的袖带压力和充入袖带的空气量显着较低（P 2 ，使用Microcuff儿科气管盆腔导管进行全身麻醉，密封袖带压力在拔管后发病方面，比手指触诊技术更安全，并且在防止漏气方面比建议的安全压力更可靠。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号