• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Society, Health & Vulnerability >“It did not come with Hitler and did not die with Hitler.” The uses of the Holocaust by disability activists in Norway
【24h】

“It did not come with Hitler and did not die with Hitler.” The uses of the Holocaust by disability activists in Norway

机译：“它不是希特勒来的，也不是希特勒死的。”挪威的残障人士对大屠杀的使用

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

When discussing present issues, vulnerable groups often compare such issues to historical atrocities, thereby injecting histories of vulnerability and oppression into contemporary debate. In 2006, the Norwegian health authorities introduced a program for registration of information about the level of functioning and the care needs of care receivers in the municipal service system, where mostly disabled people and elderly people were registered. The project triggered strong protests. The central charges were that such registration was humiliating, violated the subject's integrity, and reduced human beings to their biological (dys)functions. At one point, the protesters related the registration program to the story of the Holocaust, evoking the historical fact that registration of deviation was fundamental to the “euthanasia” killings in Nazi Germany. Numerous scholarly works discuss the legitimacy of such comparisons, but none discusses how the agents in debates think about their own use of such comparisons. In this article, we describe how the disability activists and health professionals who participated in the controversy understood, framed, and legitimated the rhetorical use of the Holocaust. Referring to Bauman's normality perspective, we try to understand the logic behind the evoking of the Holocaust in debates on the situation of vulnerable groups in general. This case serves for discussion on the communication strategies (and possibilities) of minority movements within their historical and cultural legacy.
机译：在讨论当前问题时，弱势群体经常将此类问题与历史暴行进行比较，从而将脆弱性和压迫的历史注入当代辩论中。 2006年，挪威卫生当局推出了一项计划，用于注册市政服务系统中功能水平和护理接受者的护理需求信息的程序，该系统中大多数是残疾人和老人。该项目引发了强烈抗议。主要的指控是这种注册令人屈辱，侵犯了受试者的完整性并降低了人类的生物学（功能障碍）功能。有一次，抗议者将登记计划与大屠杀的故事联系起来，唤起了这样一个历史事实，即偏差登记是纳粹德国“安乐死”杀戮的根本。许多学术著作都讨论了这种比较的合法性，但是没有人讨论辩论中的主体如何考虑自己使用这种比较。在本文中，我们描述了参与争议的残疾人活动家和卫生专业人员如何理解，设定和合法化大屠杀的言辞使用。在谈到鲍曼的常态性观点时，我们试图在关于弱势群体状况的辩论中理解引发大屠杀背后的逻辑。本案例用于讨论少数民族运动在其历史和文化遗产中的传播策略（和可能性）。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号