...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Sriwijaya Law Review >An Analysis of the Death Penalty in Indonesia Criminal Law
【24h】

An Analysis of the Death Penalty in Indonesia Criminal Law

机译：印度尼西亚刑法中死刑的分析

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This research uses normative juridical approach to study on the analysis of the death penalty executions and the legal policy of death executions in Indonesia. There are delays on death executions for the convicted person since they entitled to using rights namely filing a judicial review (PK/ Peninjauan Kembali ). Furthermore, the legal loophole in the execution of the death penalty by the publication of the Constitutional Court Number 107 / PUU-XIII / 2015 which assert that the Attorney as the executor can ask the convicted person or his family whether to use their rights or not if the convict clearly does not want to use his rights, the executions will be carried out. Legal policy on threats and the implementation of the death penalty in the draft of criminal code was agreed by draftsman of the bill with the solutions. The draftsman of the bill agrees that the death penalty will be an alternative punishment sentenced as a last resort to protect the society. The bill also regulates that the execution among others include that the execution can be delayed by ten years probations. If the public reaction on the convict is not too large or convict has regret and could fix it or the role in the crime is not very important and there is a reason to reduce punishment, the death penalty may be changed. For pregnant women and the mentally ill convicts the execution can only be carried after the birth and the person has recovered from mental illness. The existence of this solutions is still kept putting the death penalty in criminal law, whereas the effectiveness of the death penalty is scientifically still in doubt to solve crimes and to prevent crimes by the death penalty punishment.
机译：本研究采用规范化的司法方法对印度尼西亚的死刑死刑执行和死刑法律政策进行分析。被定罪者的死刑执行有延迟，因为他们有权使用权利，即进行司法审查（PK / Peninjauan Kembali）。此外，第107号宪法法院/ PUU-XIII / 2015年公布执行死刑的法律漏洞表明，作为执行人的检察官可以询问被定罪的人或其家人是否使用其权利如果罪犯显然不想使用他的权利，将执行死刑。该法案的起草人通过解决方案商定了刑法草案中关于威胁和执行死刑的法律政策。该法案的起草人同意，死刑将作为保护社会的最后手段而被判处死刑。该法案还规定，除其他外，处决包括延期十年缓刑执行。如果公众对定罪者的反应不是太大，或者定罪者感到遗憾并可以解决，或者在犯罪中的作用不是很重要，并且有减少处罚的理由，则可以改变死刑。对于孕妇和患有精神疾病的罪犯，只能在分娩后才能康复，并且该人已从精神疾病中康复。这种解决方案的存在仍然使死刑适用于刑法，而从科学上讲，死刑的有效性在解决犯罪和通过死刑预防犯罪方面仍存有疑问。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号