...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Sriwijaya Law Review >Consistency of the Presidential System in Indonesia
【24h】

Consistency of the Presidential System in Indonesia

机译：印尼总统制的一致性

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The current presidential system in Indonesia is the result of the amendments of the 1945 Constitution. Prior to Indonesian reform, the presidential system was influenced by a strong parliamentary pattern in which the president was responsible for the People's Consultative Assembly. Today, this provision is no longer exist. However, consistency of the presidential system is still problematic because the the dominance power of the president over the House of Representatives. These problematic points are not in line with presidential system principle because it reduce the authority of president. The Parliament may only establish any law as long as it is pursuant to the 1945 Constitution. This article aims to examine the issue of the Indonesian presidential system at least in two following sections. Firstly, it deals with dominance of presidential power over the House of Representatives. Secondly, president establishes the independent bodies such as Corruption Eraditation Commission (KPK) and National Commission of Human Rights (Komnas HAM) which are constitutionally less restricted.
机译：印度尼西亚当前的总统制是1945年宪法修正案的结果。在印度尼西亚改革之前，总统制受到强大的议会制影响，总统由总统主持人民协商会议。今天，该规定已不复存在。但是，总统制的一致性仍然存在问题，因为总统对众议院具有支配地位。这些有问题的观点不符合总统制原则，因为它降低了总统的权威。国会只能根据1945年《宪法》制定任何法律。本文旨在至少在以下两个部分中研究印尼总统制的问题。首先，它涉及总统对众议院的统治。其次，总统设立了独立机构，例如在宪法上受到较少限制的腐败根除委员会（KPK）和国家人权委员会（Komnas HAM）。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号