...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Sustainability >Preferences Matter: A Constructive Approach to Incorporating Local Stakeholders’ Preferences in the Sustainability Evaluation of Energy Technologies
【24h】

Preferences Matter: A Constructive Approach to Incorporating Local Stakeholders’ Preferences in the Sustainability Evaluation of Energy Technologies

机译：偏好问题：在能源技术可持续性评估中纳入当地利益相关者偏好的建设性方法

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This research paper aims at developing and applying a constructive weighting methodology for the elicitation of local stakeholders’ preferences regarding a set of sustainability evaluation criteria during the assessment of low-carbon energy technologies. The overall methodology has been applied and tested for the sustainability evaluation of selected low-carbon energy technologies in Europe from a local stakeholders’ perspective. The researchers applied a constructive weighting methodology based on different Multiple Criteria Analysis (MCA) techniques to test the consistency of stakeholders’ preferences. The methodology was piloted based on a small-scale European local stakeholders’ survey within the framework of Covenant CapaCITY, an Intelligent Energy Europe project that supports the development of Sustainable Energy Action Plans (SEAPs). It became evident that the local stakeholders who participated placed high priorities on aspects such as CO2eq emissions reduction, ecosystem damages reduction, and resilience to climate change during the evaluation of low-carbon energy technologies. Considering the overall energy technologies assessment, wind off-shore, solar PV, hydropower, and wind on-shore achieved the highest scores and better reflected the priorities of local stakeholders considering a large set of multiple sustainability criteria. The high number of criteria led to some inconsistencies of stakeholders’ preferences, confirming the need for consistency checks and/or combining different methods of preference elicitation.
机译：本研究报告旨在开发和应用一种建设性的加权方法，以在评估低碳能源技术时，激发当地利益相关者对一系列可持续性评估标准的偏好。从当地利益相关方的角度出发，已对整体方法论进行了应用和测试，以用于欧洲部分低碳能源技术的可持续性评估。研究人员应用了基于不同的多标准分析（MCA）技术的建设性加权方法，以测试利益相关者偏好的一致性。该方法基于在Covenant CapaCITY框架内进行的一次小型欧洲本地利益相关者调查而进行了试验，该框架是支持欧洲可持续能源行动计划（SEAP）制定的欧洲智能能源项目。显而易见，在评估低碳能源技术过程中，与会的当地利益相关方在降低CO 2 eq排放，减少生态系统损害以及应对气候变化等方面都给予了高度重视。考虑到整体能源技术评估，海上风电，太阳能光伏，水电和海上风电取得了最高分，并考虑了一系列多重可持续性标准，从而更好地反映了当地利益相关者的优先事项。大量标准导致利益相关者偏好的不一致，从而确认了需要进行一致性检查和/或组合不同的偏好激发方法的必要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号