...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Sustainability >Overcoming Ex-Post Development Stagnation: Interventions with Continuity and Scaling in Mind
【24h】

Overcoming Ex-Post Development Stagnation: Interventions with Continuity and Scaling in Mind

机译：克服事后发展停滞：保持连续性和头脑伸缩的干预

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Project interventions are important vehicles for development globally. However, while there is often allocation of resources for new and innovative (pilot) projects—with varying levels of success—there is seemingly less focus on consolidating and/or scaling the positive impacts of successful larger interventions. Assuming an overarching development goal to have long lasting impact at scale, this approach seems somewhat contradictory. Scaling is often not integrated into project planning, design and implementation and rarely pursued genuinely in the ex-post. However, where demand for further development remains outstanding beyond project completion, opportunities may exist to build upon project platforms and extend benefits in a cost effective manner. This paper examines existing scaling typologies, before introducing “scaling-within” as a concept to promote greater continuity of development to a wider range of stakeholders. Scaling-within offers the opportunity to “in-fill” intervention principles and practices to both project and non-project communities within a broader strategic framework to address disparities and to promote sustainable development. The authors draw on research from case studies of large-scale integrated watershed rehabilitation projects and assess scaling-within against a contemporary scaling framework drawn from the literature. While the concept is tested with watersheds as the administrative unit, the authors anticipate applications for other project management units.
机译：项目干预是全球发展的重要工具。但是，尽管通常为新的和创新的（试点）项目分配资源，但成功的程度不尽相同，但似乎很少集中于巩固和/或扩大成功的较大干预措施的积极影响。假设总体发展目标具有长期持久的规模影响，那么这种方法似乎有些矛盾。扩展通常不集成到项目计划，设计和实施中，并且很少在事后真正进行。但是，如果在项目完成后仍需继续进行进一步开发，则可能存在以项目平台为基础并以具有成本效益的方式扩展收益的机会。本文介绍了现有的规模化类型，然后介绍“内部规模化”这一概念，以促进更广泛的利益相关者的发展连续性。 “在内部扩展”提供了机会，可以在更广泛的战略框架内向项目和非项目社区“填充”干预原则和实践，以解决差距并促进可持续发展。作者从大型综合流域修复项目的案例研究中吸取了研究成果，并根据从文献中得出的现代规模化框架来评估规模。虽然以分水岭为管理单位对该概念进行了测试，但是作者预计其他项目管理单位也可以应用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号