...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Sustainability >Construction Waste Management Profiles, Practices, and Performance: A Cross-Jurisdictional Analysis in Four Countries
【24h】

Construction Waste Management Profiles, Practices, and Performance: A Cross-Jurisdictional Analysis in Four Countries

机译：建筑废物管理概况，实践和绩效：四个国家的跨辖区分析

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Construction waste management (CWM) has received worldwide attention for some time. As a result, a plethora of research, investigating a wide array of CWM issues such as their profiles, practices, and performance, has been reported in individual economies around the globe. However, a cross-jurisdictional comparison of these issues is limitedly presented in the literature despite its importance to benchmarking performance and identifying best CWM practices in the context of globalization whereby knowledge sharing has already transcended traditional country boundaries. The aim of this ex post facto research is to compare CWM profiles, practices, and performance in Australia, Europe (Europe refers to EU-27 member countries in the European Union, including Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Denmark, Great Britain, Ireland, Portugal, Spain, Greece, Austria, Finland, Sweden, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia, Malta, Cyprus, Bulgaria, and Romania.), Hong Kong, and the United Kingdom at a national-level, with a view to facilitating CWM knowledge sharing internationally. It does so by triangulating empirical data collected from various national statistical yearbooks with research papers and professional reports on CWM in these economies. It is found that in producing one million (US) dollars’ work, construction contributes a volume of solid waste ranging from 28 to 121 tons among countries. Conscientious CWM practices can make a significant difference in reducing, reusing, or recycling construction waste, as evident in the large variation in the CWM performance. While it might be oversimplified to conclude that the best practices in one country can be applied in another, the research provides insightful references into sharing CWM knowledge across boundaries.
机译：建筑垃圾管理（CWM）在一段时间以来已受到全世界的关注。结果，全球各个经济体都进行了大量的研究，以调查各种CWM问题，例如它们的概况，实践和绩效。但是，尽管这些文献对基准化绩效和在全球化背景下确定最佳CWM做法非常重要，但知识共享已经超越了传统的国家边界，但是在文献中很少对这些问题进行跨辖区比较。事后研究的目的是比较澳大利亚，欧洲的CWM概况，实践和绩效（欧洲是指欧盟的EU-27成员国，包括比利时，法国，德国，意大利，卢森堡，荷兰，丹麦，英国，爱尔兰，葡萄牙，西班牙，希腊，奥地利，芬兰，瑞典，捷克共和国，爱沙尼亚，匈牙利，拉脱维亚，立陶宛，波兰，斯洛伐克，斯洛文尼亚，马耳他，塞浦路斯，保加利亚和罗马尼亚），香港和联合王国在国家一级，以促进国际上的CWM知识共享。它通过将从各种国家统计年鉴中收集的经验数据与有关这些经济体中CWM的研究论文和专业报告进行三角划分。人们发现，建筑在产生一百万美元的作品中，各国之间产生的固体废物量从28吨到121吨不等。严格的CWM实践可以在减少，重复使用或回收建筑废料方面产生重大变化，这在CWM性能的巨大差异中显而易见。虽然得出一个国家的最佳实践可以在另一个国家中应用的结论可能过于简单，但该研究为跨边界共享CWM知识提供了有见地的参考。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号