• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Pain research & management: the journal of the Canadian Pain Society = journal de la socie?te? canadienne pour le traitement de la douleur >A Better Way to Decrease Knee Swelling in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Single-Blind Randomised Controlled Trial
【24h】

A Better Way to Decrease Knee Swelling in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Single-Blind Randomised Controlled Trial

机译：减少膝骨关节炎患者膝肿的更好方法：单盲随机对照试验

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Objective. In this study, we compared the effects of intermittent pneumatic compression along with conventional treatment with cold-pack treatment along with conventional treatment on clinical outcomes in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Methods. Eighty-nine patients with knee osteoarthritis participated in this study. One group received ultrasound, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, electrical stimulation, exercise, and cold packs. The second group received ultrasound, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, electrical stimulation, exercise, and intermittent pneumatic compression. Range of motion, muscle strength, knee swelling, pain intensity, and functional status were measured at baseline and 4th week. Results. We found significant improvements in range of motion, muscle strength, pain intensity, and functional status after the treatment in both groups (). When comparing the effects of these two treatment programs, it was observed that the intermittent pneumatic compression treatment group had a better outcome in terms of knee swelling ().Conclusions. According to the results, we could report that intermittent pneumatic compression therapy in addition to conventional treatment has significant positive effects on clinical outcomes in patients with knee osteoarthritis. We could also report that intermittent pneumatic compression therapy along with conventional treatment is superior to cold-pack therapy along with conventional treatment in terms of knee swelling in patients with knee osteoarthritis. This trial is registered with NCT03806322.
机译：目的。在这项研究中，我们比较了间歇性气压结合常规疗法与冷敷疗法以及常规疗法对膝骨关节炎患者的临床效果的影响。方法。八十九名膝关节骨关节炎患者参加了这项研究。一组接受超声，经皮电神经刺激，电刺激，运动和冰袋。第二组接受超声，经皮电神经刺激，电刺激，运动和间歇性气压压缩。在基线和第4周测量运动范围，肌肉力量，膝盖肿胀，疼痛强度和功能状态。结果。我们发现两组患者的运动范围，肌肉力量，疼痛强度和功能状态都有显着改善（）。比较这两种治疗方案的效果时，观察到间歇性气压治疗组在膝关节肿胀方面有更好的预后（）。结论。根据研究结果，我们可以报告，除常规治疗外，间歇性气压治疗对膝骨关节炎患者的临床结局具有明显的积极影响。我们还可能报告说，就膝骨关节炎患者而言，在膝关节肿胀方面，间歇性气压疗法与常规疗法相结合优于冷敷疗法与常规疗法。该试用版已在NCT03806322中注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号