...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Systematic Reviews >Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review
【24h】

Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review

机译：评估系统评价和荟萃分析（PRISMA）陈述及扩展的首选报告项目的使用和影响：范围界定审查

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The PRISMA Statement is a reporting guideline designed to improve transparency of systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses. Seven extensions to the PRISMA Statement have been published to address the reporting of different types or aspects of SRs, and another eight are in development. We performed a scoping review to map the research that has been conducted to evaluate the uptake and impact of the PRISMA Statement and extensions. We also synthesised studies evaluating how well SRs published after the PRISMA Statement was disseminated adhere to its recommendations. We searched for meta-research studies indexed in MEDLINE? from inception to 31 July 2017, which investigated some component of the PRISMA Statement or extensions (e.g. SR adherence to PRISMA, journal endorsement of PRISMA). One author screened all records and classified the types of evidence available in the studies. We pooled data on SR adherence to individual PRISMA items across all SRs in the included studies and across SRs published after 2009 (the year PRISMA was disseminated). We included 100 meta-research studies. The most common type of evidence available was data on SR adherence to the PRISMA Statement, which has been evaluated in 57 studies that have assessed 6487 SRs. The pooled results of these studies suggest that reporting of many items in the PRISMA Statement is suboptimal, even in the 2382 SRs published after 2009 (where nine items were adhered to by fewer than 67% of SRs). Few meta-research studies have evaluated the adherence of SRs to the PRISMA extensions or strategies to increase adherence to the PRISMA Statement and extensions. Many studies have evaluated how well SRs adhere to the PRISMA Statement, and the pooled result of these suggest that reporting of many items is suboptimal. An update of the PRISMA Statement, along with a toolkit of strategies to help journals endorse and implement the updated guideline, may improve the transparency of SRs.
机译：PRISMA声明是旨在提高系统评价（SR）和元分析的透明度的报告指南。已发布PRISMA声明的七个扩展，以解决SR的不同类型或方面的报告，另外八个正在开发中。我们进行了范围界定审查，以对进行的研究进行评估，以评估PRISMA声明和扩展的采用和影响。我们还综合评估了PRISMA声明发布后发布的SR遵守其建议的程度的研究。我们搜索了以MEDLINE索引的元研究？从成立到2017年7月31日，调查了PRISMA声明或扩展名的某些组成部分（例如SR对PRISMA的遵守情况，PRISMA的期刊认可）。一位作者筛选了所有记录，并对研究中可用的证据类型进行了分类。我们汇总了纳入研究中所有SR以及2009年之后发布的SR的SR对单个PRISMA项目坚持性的数据。我们纳入了100项荟萃研究。最常见的证据类型是关于SR遵守PRISMA声明的数据，该数据已在57项评估了6487 SR的研究中进行了评估。这些研究的汇总结果表明，即使在2009年之后发布的2382个SR中，PRISMA声明中许多项目的报告也不是很理想（其中只有9项被遵守，只有67％的SR遵守）。很少有荟萃研究评估SR对PRISMA扩展的依从性或提高对PRISMA声明和扩展的依从性的策略。许多研究评估了SR遵守PRISMA声明的程度，这些结果的汇总表明，许多项目的报告不是最理想的。 PRISMA声明的更新，以及可帮助期刊认可和实施更新指南的策略工具包，可提高SR的透明度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号