...
首页> 外文期刊>Patient Preference and Adherence >Psychometric properties of the Ruminative Response Scale-short form in a clinical sample of patients with major depressive disorder
【24h】

Psychometric properties of the Ruminative Response Scale-short form in a clinical sample of patients with major depressive disorder

机译:严重抑郁症患者临床样本中反刍量表-简短形式的心理计量学特征

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: The Ruminative Response Scale (RRS)-short form is one of the most widely used measures of rumination, comprising ten items and two components: reflection and brooding. The aim of this study was to investigate RRS validity and reliability in a clinical sample of French patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Subjects and methods: Outpatients with a DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of MDD were recruited from a public academic hospital in France. Depressive symptoms were evaluated by the Beck Depression Inventory, anxiety by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory – state scale, and quality of life by the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire. Confirmatory factor analyses, item-dimension correlations, Cronbach’s α -coefficients, Rasch statistics, and external validity were tested. Differential item functioning analyses were performed for sex. Results: A total of 109 patients participated. The final reflection–brooding two-factor model of the RRS showed a good fit (root-mean-square error of approximation 0.041, comparative fit index 0.987, standardized root-mean-square residual 0.048) after removing one item (daily diary writing). Internal item consistency and reliability were satisfactory for the two dimensions. External validity testing confirmed that RRS scores were correlated with Beck Depression Inventory, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and SF-36 scores. There was no differential item functioning across sexes. Conclusion: These results demonstrated good scale reliability and validity for assessing rumination in patients with MDD.
机译:背景:简短的反刍反应量表(RRS)是反省最广泛的反省措施之一,包括十个项目和两个组成部分:反射和沉思。这项研究的目的是调查法国重度抑郁症(MDD)患者临床样本中的RRS有效性和可靠性。受试者和方法:从法国一家公立学术医院招募了诊断为MDD的DSM-IV-TR的门诊患者。抑郁症状通过贝克抑郁量表进行评估,焦虑通过状态-特质焦虑量表(状态量表)进行评估,生活质量通过36项简易健康调查(SF-36)问卷进行评估。测试了验证性因素分析,项目维度相关性,Cronbach的α系数,Rasch统计量和外部有效性。对性别进行差异项功能分析。结果:共109例患者参加。删除一项后(每日日记写作),RRS的最终反射-育成两因素模型显示出良好的拟合度(均方根误差约为0.041,比较拟合指数为0.987,标准均方根残差为0.048)。 。内部物品的一致性和可靠性对于这两个方面都令人满意。外部有效性测试证实RRS得分与贝克抑郁量表,状态特质焦虑量表和SF-36得分相关。没有性别差异功能。结论:这些结果证明了评估MDD患者反刍的良好量表信度和效度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号