• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>PARTECIPAZIONE E CONFLITTO >The Discourse of Anti-Instrumentalism: Exploring a Conceptual Model Through the Case Study of the We Won't Let Belgrade D(r)own Initiative
【24h】

The Discourse of Anti-Instrumentalism: Exploring a Conceptual Model Through the Case Study of the We Won't Let Belgrade D(r)own Initiative

机译：反工具主义话语：通过“我们不会让贝尔格莱德D（r）拥有倡议”的案例研究探索概念模型

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The main focus of our paper is on a specific form of democratic discourse, used in different types of social engagement actions (petitions, speeches, intellectual engagement, ad hoc citizens' protests, social movements etc.), that attempts to politicize a certain issue by challenging the neoliberal principle of instrumentalism which argues that democratic procedures can legitimately be abandoned in the name of the greater efficiency of socio-economic development. Therefore, we start from identifying the discourse of "neoliberal instrumentalism" and its relative success in delegitimizing the welfare state and mechanisms of democratic decision making and we formulate a conceptual model of a democratic counter-narrative named "anti-instrumentalist discourse". Through empirical analyses of discourse used by We Won't Let Belgrade D(r)own initiative, that mobilized against the Serbian government's urban project Belgrade Wa-terfront we try to illustrate the applicability and the heuristic value of the proposed model. The data for the analyses were collected through 1) desk analysis of available secondary data on the Belgrade Waterfront project, 2) official statements and proclamations of the We Won't Let Belgrade D(r)own initiative, 3) semi-structured interviews with four core members of the initiative.
机译：本文的主要重点是民主话语的一种特定形式，用于不同类型的社会参与活动（请愿，演讲，智力参与，临时公民的抗议，社会运动等），试图将某个问题政治化通过质疑工具主义的新自由主义原则，该原则认为可以以提高社会经济发展效率为名义合法地放弃民主程序。因此，我们从确定“新工具主义”的话语及其在使福利状态和民主决策机制合法化方面的相对成功开始，并建立了一个民主的反叙事的概念模型，称为“反工具主义话语”。通过对塞尔维亚政府的城市项目贝尔格莱德·沃特弗朗特动员的我们不会让贝尔格莱德D（r）倡议采取的话语的实证分析，我们试图说明所提出模型的适用性和启发式价值。用于分析的数据是通过以下方式收集的：1）对贝尔格莱德滨水项目可用的辅助数据进行案头分析; 2）威尔特不会让贝尔格莱德D（r）倡议的正式声明和声明; 3）与他人进行半结构化访谈该倡议的四个核心成员。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号