...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>SA Journal of Industrial Psychology >Investigating the construct validity of a development assessment centre
【24h】

Investigating the construct validity of a development assessment centre

机译：调查开发评估中心的构建有效性

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Orientation: The assessment centre (AC) is a prominent measurement tool for selection and development.Research purpose: The aim of this study was to determine the construct validity of a one-day development assessment centre (DAC) using a convenience sample of 202 managers in a large South African banking institution.Motivation for the study: Although the AC method is popular, it has been widely criticised as to whether it predominantly measures the dimensions it is designed to measure.Research design, approach and method: The fit of the measurement models implied by the dimensions measured was analysed in a quantitative study using an ex post facto correlation design and structural equation modelling.Main findings: Bi-factor confirmatory factor analysis was used to assess the relative contribution of higher-order exercise and dimension effects. Empirical under-identification stemming from the small number of exercises designed to reflect designated latent dimensions restricted the number of DAC dimensions that could be evaluated. Ultimately, only one global dimension had enough measurement points and was analysed. The results suggested that dimension effects explained the majority of variance in the post-exercise dimension ratings.Practical/managerial implications: Candidates' proficiency on each dimension was used as the basis for development reports. The validity of inferences holds important implications for candidates' career development and growth.Contribution/value-add: The authors found only one study on construct validity of AC dimensions in the South African context. The present study is the first use the bi-factor approach. This study will consequently contribute to the scarce AC literature in South Africa.
机译：方向：评估中心（AC）是用于选择和开发的重要度量工具。研究目的：本研究的目的是使用202位管理人员的方便样本来确定一日发展评估中心（DAC）的构建有效性研究动机：尽管AC方法很流行，但它是否主要测量设计用来测量的尺寸已受到广泛批评。研究设计，方法和方法：使用事后相关设计和结构方程模型在定量研究中分析了测量尺寸所隐含的测量模型。主要发现：双因素确认因子分析用于评估高阶运动和尺寸效应的相对贡献。由于为反映指定的潜在维度而设计的少量练习导致经验不足，因此无法评估DAC维度的数量。最终，只有一个全局维度具有足够的测量点并进行了分析。结果表明，尺寸效应解释了运动后尺寸等级的大部分差异。实际/管理意义：候选人在每个尺寸上的熟练程度被用作发展报告的基础。推论的有效性对应聘者的职业发展和成长具有重要意义。贡献/增值：作者仅发现一项关于南非语境中AC维度的构造效度的研究。本研究是首次使用双因素方法。因此，这项研究将有助于南非稀有的交流文献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号