• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Physical Culture: journal of sports sciences and physical education >The differences of the applied methods in the assessment of body composition of adolescent boys
【24h】

The differences of the applied methods in the assessment of body composition of adolescent boys

机译：青春期男孩身体成分评估中应用方法的差异

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The sample of 234 7th and 8th grade boys, attending elementary schools located within the town of Sombor, was subject to body composition assessment by using the indices of body composition (body mass index) and methods by Mateika. Based on the estimated fat mass value, using the method by Mateika, the subjects were categorized by age, as recommended by McCarthy et al. Based on indices of body composition, also depending on the age, they were classified into categories according to the International Obesity Task Force (IOTF) standards, determined by Cole et al. There was a significant difference in the number of subjects classified in the category of the overweight and those classified in the category of the obese in favor of greater sensitivity of the method by Mateika. Considering that for both categories medical monitoring is recommended, the results of the research give priority to the assessment of body composition by the method by Mateika despite much more complex methodology.
机译：通过使用Mateika的身体成分指数（体重指数）和方法，对位于Sombor镇内小学的234名7、8年级男孩的样本进行了身体成分评估。根据估算的脂肪质量值，使用Mateika的方法，按照麦卡锡等人的建议，按年龄对受试者进行分类。根据身体组成指标，还取决于年龄，根据国际肥胖特别工作组（IOTF）标准（由Cole等人确定）将其分类。由于Mateika对方法的敏感性更高，分类为超重类别的受试者和分类为肥胖类别的受试者的数量存在显着差异。考虑到建议同时使用两种方法进行医学监测，因此尽管方法更为复杂，但研究结果仍优先采用Mateika的方法评估身体成分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号