...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Practical Academic Librarianship: the International Journal of the SLA Academic Division >A Comparison of HathiTrust and Google Books using Federal Publications
【24h】

A Comparison of HathiTrust and Google Books using Federal Publications

机译：HathiTrust和Google图书使用联邦出版物的比较

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;mso-style-noshow:yes;mso-style-priority:99;mso-style-qformat:yes;mso-style-parent:"";mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;mso-para-margin-top:0in;mso-para-margin-right:0in;mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt;mso-para-margin-left:0in;line-height:115%;mso-pagination:widow-orphan;font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;} This study compares the functionality of the Google Books and HathiTrust online repositories using federal government publications. Record overlap between the two databases was examined. Functionality such as ease of finding specific titles, citation extraction, book bags, and other features such as metadata are covered. Also conducted was a look at the quality of records for these repositories in the WorldCat database. This study found that both Google Books and HathiTrust have benefits and flaws and that the needs of the user will help librarians determine which to recommend to patrons.
机译：正常0否否否EN-US X-NONE X-NONE / *样式定义* / table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name：“ Table Normal”; mso-tstyle-rowband-size：0; mso-tstyle-colband -size：0; mso-style-noshow：yes; mso-style-priority：99; mso-style-qformat：yes; mso-style-parent：“”; mso-padding-alt：0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt ; mso-para-margin-top：0in; mso-para-margin-right：0in; mso-para-margin-bottom：10.0pt; mso-para-margin-left：0in; line-height：115％; mso -分页：寡妇孤儿;字体大小：11.0pt;字体家族：“ Calibri”，“ sans-serif”; mso-ascii-font-family：Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font：次要拉丁; mso-fareast-font-family：“ Times New Roman”; mso-fareast-theme-font：minor-fareast; mso-hansi-font-family：Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font：minor-latin; mso- bidi-font-family：“ Times New Roman”; mso-bidi-theme-font：minor-bidi;}本研究使用联邦政府出版物比较了Google图书和HathiTrust在线存储库的功能。检查了两个数据库之间的记录重叠。涵盖了诸如查找特定标题的便利性，引文摘录，书包之类的功能以及诸如元数据之类的其他功能。还对WorldCat数据库中这些存储库的记录质量进行了研究。这项研究发现，Google图书和HathiTrust都有优点和缺点，并且用户的需求将帮助图书馆员确定向读者推荐的内容。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号