• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Public Policy and Administration Research >Non-termination of policy of bonus point for the minority groups in China’s college entrance examination based on advocacy coalition framework
【24h】

Non-termination of policy of bonus point for the minority groups in China’s college entrance examination based on advocacy coalition framework

机译：基于倡导联盟框架的中国高考少数民族不加分政策

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Policy termination is the special form of policy change, including whole termination and partial termination. The policy of bonus point to the disadvantaged groups in China’s college entrance examination has aroused much controversies in implementation process, especially whether the policy of bonus point to minorities maintains or cancels. The suggestion on policy of bonus points in the college entrance examination at the end of 2014 has abolished the rewarding policy and on the contrary maintained the preferential policy, manifesting policy of bonus points just realized partial termination. The study makes clear the key factor of influencing basic attitude is policy goals and value preferences rather than interests or institutional attributes, which form the different coalitions due to differences in beliefs, thus making the policy maintain. Support coalition and opposition coalition are the two basic coalitions. The advocacy coalition framework has strong fit in a few problems that how to explain why the policy of bonus point to minorities keeps stable, whether to terminate in the future and how to terminate it etc.. We hope to contribute to a better understanding of preferential policy in general and of the stability and change and variation, thus prompting the whole termination of bonus-point system, improving the reform of China’s college entrance examination and realization of education fairness and equality.
机译：策略终止是策略更改的一种特殊形式，包括整个终止和部分终止。中国高考中的弱势群体奖励政策在实施过程中引起了很多争议，尤其是少数民族的奖励政策是维持还是取消。 2014年底高考奖励积分政策的建议取消了奖励政策，相反保留了优惠政策，体现出奖励积分政策刚刚实现部分终止。该研究表明，影响基本态度的关键因素是政策目标和价值偏好，而不是利益或制度属性，这是由于信念差异而形成的不同联盟，从而使政策得以维持。支持联盟和反对派联盟是两个基本联盟。倡导联盟框架非常适合解决以下几个问题：如何解释对少数群体的奖励积分政策为何保持稳定，将来是否终止以及如何终止等。我们希望有助于更好地理解优惠政策。政策的整体性和稳定性，变化性和变异性，从而促使积分制的整体终止，促进了我国高考制度的改革，实现了教育公平与平等。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号