首页> 外文期刊>The European journal of general practice. >Partial adoption of ‘minimal core curriculum’ in undergraduate teaching of family medicine: A cross-sectional study among Central and South-Eastern European medical schools
【24h】

Partial adoption of ‘minimal core curriculum’ in undergraduate teaching of family medicine: A cross-sectional study among Central and South-Eastern European medical schools

机译:在家庭医学本科教学中部分采用“最低核心课程”:中欧和东南欧医学院校的横断面研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Abstract Background: In 2011, Tandeter et?al. published a list of 15 themes, based on a Delphi survey among representatives of the European Academy of Teachers in General Practice and Family Medicine (EURACT), and suggested this be the ‘minimal core curriculum’ (MCC) for undergraduate education in family medicine. Objectives: To determine: (1) if medical schools in the former Yugoslavia region are familiar with the MCC; and (2) to what degree it is being taught to medical students. Methods: In July 2015, a questionnaire was distributed to 19 medical schools in the former Yugoslavia region. A copy of the description of the curriculum for GP/FM was requested from participants. Two researchers conducted content analysis of the curricula according to the 15 predefined MCC themes, independently. Results: Thirteen (68%) medical schools responded. Of these, 10 (77%) stated that they were familiar with the MCC. Not a single institution encompassed all 15 MCC themes. The number of themes included by individual medical schools ranged from 6/15 (40%) to 13/15 (87%).The following themes were covered by 12 of 13 (92%) medical schools: Introduction to GP/FM; communication skills; prevention and health promotion; and management of chronic diseases. The three themes most poorly covered were: consulting skills (5/13), management of diseases at an early, undifferentiated stage (2/13) and decision-making based on prevalence and incidence (1/13). Conclusion: Despite familiarity with EURACT’s MCC among medical schools in the former Yugoslavia region, significant variation in curricula content exists, and no curriculum covered all MCC themes.
机译:摘要背景:2011年,Tandeter等人。根据Delphi对欧洲全科医学与家庭医学教师学院(EURACT)的代表进行的调查,发布了15个主题的列表,并建议这是针对家庭医学本科教育的“最低核心课程”(MCC)。目标:确定:(1)前南斯拉夫地区的医学院是否熟悉MCC; (2)对医学生的教育程度如何。方法:2015年7月,向前南斯拉夫地区的19所医学院派发了调查表。与会者要求提供GP / FM课程说明的副本。两名研究人员根据15个预定义的MCC主题分别对课程进行了内容分析。结果:十三所医学院(68%)对此做出了回应。其中有10位(77%)表示他们熟悉MCC。没有哪一个机构涵盖所有15个MCC主题。个别医学院校包含的主题数量从6/15(40%)到13/15(87%)。13个医学院校中的12个(92%)涵盖了以下主题:GP / FM简介;沟通技巧;预防和健康促进;和慢性病的管理。覆盖最差的三个主题是:咨询技能(5/13),早期,未分化阶段的疾病管理(2/13)和基于患病率和发病率的决策(1/13)。结论:尽管前南斯拉夫地区的医学院校对EURACT的MCC有所了解,但课程内容存在很大差异,并且没有涵盖所有MCC主题的课程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号