首页> 外文期刊>The International Journal of Alcohol and Drug Research >Patterns of alcohol policy enforcement activities among local law enforcement agencies: A latent class analysis
【24h】

Patterns of alcohol policy enforcement activities among local law enforcement agencies: A latent class analysis

机译:地方执法机构之间酒精政策执法活动的模式:潜在类别分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Erickson, D., Rutledge, P., Lenk, K., Nelson, T., Jones-Webb, R., & Toomey, T. (2015). Patterns of alcohol policy enforcement activities among local law enforcement agencies: A latent class analysis. The International Journal Of Alcohol And Drug Research, 4 (2), 103-111. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7895/ijadr.v4i2.204 Aims: We assessed levels and patterns of alcohol policy enforcement activities among U.S. local law enforcement agencies. Design/Setting/Participants: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of a representative sample of 1,631 local law enforcement agencies across the 50 states. Measures/Methods: We assessed 29 alcohol policy enforcement activities within each of five enforcement domains—underage alcohol possession/consumption, underage alcohol provision, underage alcohol sales, impaired driving, and overservice of alcohol—and conducted a series of latent class analyses to identify unique classes or patterns of enforcement activity for each domain. Findings: We identified three to four unique enforcement activity classes for each of the enforcement domains. In four of the domains, we identified a Uniformly Low class (i.e., little or no enforcement) and a Uniformly High enforcement activity class (i.e., relatively high levels of enforcement), with one or two middle classes where some but not all activities were conducted. The underage provision domain had a Uniformly Low class but not a Uniformly High class. The Uniformly Low class was the most prevalent class in three domains: underage provision (58%), underage sales (61%), and overservice (79%). In contrast, less than a quarter of agencies were in Uniformly High classes. Conclusions: We identified qualitatively distinct patterns of enforcement activity, with a large proportion of agencies in classes characterized by little or no enforcement and fewer agencies in high enforcement classes. An important next step is to determine if these patterns are associated with rates of alcohol use and alcohol-related injury and mortality.
机译:Erickson,D.,Rutledge,P.,Lenk,K.,Nelson,T.,Jones-Webb,R.,&Toomey,T.(2015年)。地方执法机构之间的酒精政策执法活动模式:潜在类别分析。国际酒精与药物研究杂志,4(2),103-111。 doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.7895/ijadr.v4i2.204目的:我们评估了美国地方执法机构中酒精政策实施活动的水平和模式。设计/设置/参与者:我们对50个州的1,631个地方执法机构的代表性样本进行了横断面调查。措施/方法:我们评估了五个执法领域(未成年人拥有/消费,未成年人提供的酒精,未成年人销售的酒精,驾驶不便和服务过度)五个领域中的29次酒精政策实施活动,并进行了一系列潜在类别分析,以确定每个域的执行活动的唯一类或模式。调查结果:我们为每个执法领域确定了三到四个独特的执法活动类别。在四个领域中,我们确定了一个统一的低等级(即很少或没有执行)和一个统一的高等级活动(即相对较高的执行水平),其中一两个中产阶级是一些但不是全部活动进行。未成年人提供域具有统一的低等级,但没有统一的高等级。统一低下等级是三个领域中最普遍的等级:未成年人提供(58%),未成年人销售(61%)和服务过度(79%)。相比之下,只有不到四分之一的代理商处于统一高级水平。结论:我们确定了执法活动的性质上截然不同的模式,班级中有很大比例的代理机构很少执行或根本没有执行,而高级别的代理机构较少。下一步的重要步骤是确定这些模式是否与饮酒率以及与酒精有关的伤害和死亡率有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号