首页> 外文期刊>The Open Pain Journal >The Role of Suggestions in Hypnosis for Chronic Pain: A Review of the Literature
【24h】

The Role of Suggestions in Hypnosis for Chronic Pain: A Review of the Literature

机译:建议在慢性疼痛催眠中的作用:文献综述。

获取原文
           

摘要

Several controlled trials have demonstrated that hypnosis is an efficacious treatment for chronic pain. However, less attention has been given to the specific procedures and suggestions used in hypnotic treatments in research. The goal of this review was to address the issue of differences in the content of hypnotic suggestions, including pain management suggestions, non-pain related suggestions, and posthypnotic suggestions, in the context of published clinical trials of hypnosis for chronic pain management. This review focused on the types of suggestions used in twenty five studies comparing hypnosis to active treatments (e.g., relaxation, biofeedback), non-treatment control groups (e.g., standard care/wait-list control, supportive attention), or both in adult populations with various chronic pain conditions. Overall, these studies found hypnosis to be more effective than non-treatment control groups and similarly effective when compared to active treatments on pain-related outcomes when either pain-related suggestions or non-pain related suggestions were used. However, for studies that included both pain-specific and non-pain related suggestions, hypnosis was found to be superior to active treatments on a variety of pain-related outcomes.
机译:几个对照试验表明,催眠是治疗慢性疼痛的有效方法。但是,对催眠治疗研究中使用的具体程序和建议的关注较少。这篇综述的目的是在已发表的用于慢性疼痛管理的催眠临床试验的背景下,解决催眠建议内容的差异问题,包括疼痛管理建议,非疼痛相关建议和催眠后建议。这篇综述的重点是在成人比较催眠与主动治疗(例如放松,生物反馈),非治疗对照组(例如标准护理/等待名单控制,支持性关注)或两者的25项研究中使用的建议类型具有各种慢性疼痛状况的人群。总体而言,这些研究发现,在使用疼痛相关建议或非疼痛相关建议时,催眠术比非治疗对照组更有效,并且与主动治疗相比,对疼痛相关结果的效果相似。但是,对于同时包含疼痛特异性和非疼痛相关建议的研究,发现在各种与疼痛相关的结局方面,催眠优于主动治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号