...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Procedia CIRP >Life Cycle Assessment of One-way and Pooled Pallet Alternatives
【24h】

Life Cycle Assessment of One-way and Pooled Pallet Alternatives

机译：单向和集合式托盘替代品的生命周期评估

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Questions remain over the environmental performance of pooled pallets compared to one-way pallet alternatives. The environmental impacts of softwood, hardwood, plastic and cardboard pallets, for use in one-way and pooled pallet systems with manufacturing in either China or Australia, were compared with the use of life cycle assessment. The use of wood and regular maintenance leads to lesser environmental impact, as well as reduced servicing costs, in many typical applications through allowing a greater number of pallet uses between servicing and over the whole lifecycle. The environmental benefits of one-way pallets emerge for specific scenarios involving longer transport distances outside pooling catchments.
机译：与单向托盘替代方案相比，合并托盘的环境性能仍然存在问题。将用于中国或澳大利亚制造的单向和集中式托盘系统的软木，硬木，塑料和纸板托盘的环境影响与生命周期评估进行了比较。在许多典型应用中，使用木材和定期维护可减少对环境的影响，并降低维修成本，这是因为在维修之间以及整个生命周期中允许使用更多数量的托盘。单向托盘的环境效益在特定情况下显现出来，涉及在集水区外更长的运输距离。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号