A new fuzzy additive ratio assessment method (ARAS‐F). Case study: The analysis of fuzzy multiple criteria in order to select the logistic centers location

Zenonas Turskis; Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas

首页> 外文期刊>Transport >A new fuzzy additive ratio assessment method (ARAS‐F). Case study: The analysis of fuzzy multiple criteria in order to select the logistic centers location

【24h】

A new fuzzy additive ratio assessment method (ARAS‐F). Case study: The analysis of fuzzy multiple criteria in order to select the logistic centers location

机译：一种新的模糊加性比率评估方法（ARAS-F）。案例研究：分析模糊多准则以选择物流中心位置

获取原文

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

The main approaches which are applied to select the logistic center are the methods of gravity center, analytic hierarchy process, similarity to ideal solution, fuzzy ranking, assessment, etc. Multiple Criteria Decision‐Making (MCDM) combines analytical and inductive knowledge, describing a domain problem, which can be fuzzy and/or incomplete. The fuzzy MCDM (FMCDM) approach can explain the problem more appropriately. The purpose of the paper is to select the most suitable site for logistic centre among a set of alternatives, to help the stakeholders with the performance evaluation in an uncertain environment, where the subjectivity and vagueness of criteria are described by triangular fuzzy numbers. The paper presents a newly‐developed ARAS‐F method to solve different problems in transport, construction, economics, technology and sustainable development. First published online: 10 Feb 2011.

机译：选择物流中心的主要方法是重心方法，层次分析法，与理想解的相似度，模糊等级，评估等。多标准决策（MCDM）结合了分析和归纳知识，描述了领域问题，可能是模糊的和/或不完整的。模糊MCDM（FMCDM）方法可以更恰当地解释该问题。本文的目的是从一组备选方案中选择最适合物流中心的地点，以帮助利益相关者在不确定的环境中进行绩效评估，在该环境中，标准的主观性和模糊性由三角模糊数来描述。本文提出了一种新开发的ARAS-F方法，以解决交通，建筑，经济，技术和可持续发展方面的各种问题。首次在线发布：2011年2月10日。

著录项

来源
《Transport》 |2010年第4期|共10页
作者
Zenonas Turskis; Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类交通运输经济;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. A new fuzzy additive ratio assessment method (ARASa??F). Case study: The analysis of fuzzy multiple criteria in order to select the logistic centers location [J] . Zenonas Turskis, Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas Transport . 2010,第4期

机译：一种新的模糊加和比评估方法（ARASa ?? F）。案例研究：分析模糊多准则以选择物流中心位置
2. Fuzzy Multiple Criteria Assessment of Construction Site Alternatives for Non-Hazardous Waste Incineration Plant in Vilnius City, Applying ARAS-F and AHP Methods [J] . Zenonas Turskis Marius Lazauskas Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management . 2012,第2期

机译：应用ARAS-F和AHP方法对维尔纽斯市无害废物焚烧厂施工现场方案进行模糊多准则评估
3. Hub location selection of third-party logistics service on multiple countries consolidations for ocean freight forwarders by using fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach [J] . Tzay-An Shiau, Li-Mei Lin, Ji-Feng Ding, International Journal of Physical Sciences . 2011,第19期

机译：使用模糊多准则决策（MCDM）方法选择多国合并中的第三方物流服务中心位置，用于海运代理
4. Fuzzy Comprehensive Assessment of location selection for Railway Logistics Centers with Compound Weights [C] . FANG YAO, rnXIUMEI GAO, rnYAN WU, International conference on systems science, management science and system dynamics . 2007

机译：复合权重的铁路物流中心选址的模糊综合评价
5. Using Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets (PFS) in Multiple Criteria Group Decision Making (MCGDM) Methods for Engineering Materials Selection Applications [D] . Momena, Alaa. 2019

机译：在多个标准组决策中使用Pythagorean模糊集（PFS）（MCGDM）工程材料选择应用方法
6. A Multicriteria Decision Making Approach Based on Fuzzy Theory and Credibility Mechanism for Logistics Center Location Selection [O] . Bowen Wang, Haitao Xiong, Chengrui Jiang -1

机译：基于模糊理论和信誉机制的物流中心选址多准则决策方法
7. A Novel Method for Multiple Criteria Analysis: Grey Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS-G) Method [O] . Zenonas Turskis, Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas 2010

机译：一种新的多种标准分析方法：灰度添加比率评估（ARAS-G）方法

A new fuzzy additive ratio assessment method (ARAS‐F). Case study: The analysis of fuzzy multiple criteria in order to select the logistic centers location

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅