...
首页> 外文期刊>Yonsei Medical Journal >The Frequency of Reexpansion Pulmonary Edema after Trocar and Hemostat Assisted Thoracostomy in Patients with Spontaneous Pneumothorax
【24h】

The Frequency of Reexpansion Pulmonary Edema after Trocar and Hemostat Assisted Thoracostomy in Patients with Spontaneous Pneumothorax

机译:自发性气胸患者经套管针和止血药辅助开胸手术后再发肺水肿的频率

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose Several risk factors for development of reexpansion pulmonary edema (REPE) after drainage of pneumothoraces have been reported, but the association between the method of thoracostomy and the development of REPE is unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the frequency of REPE after treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax with trocar or hemostat assisted closed thoracostomy. Materials and Methods We performed a prospective, observational study including 173 patients with spontaneous pneumothorax who visited the emergency department from January 2007 to December 2008. In 2007, patients were treated with hemostat-assisted drainage, whereas patients in 2008 were treated with trocar-assisted drainage. The main outcome was the development of REPE, determined by computed tomography of the chest 8 hours after closed thoracostomy. Outcomes in both groups were compared using univariate and multivariate analyses. Results Ninety-two patients were included, 48 (42 males) of which underwent hemostat-assisted drainage and 44 (41 males) underwent trocar-assisted drainage. The groups were similar in mean age (24±10 vs. 26±14 respectively). The frequencies of REPE after hemostat- and trocar-assisted drainage were 63% (30 patients) and 86% (38 patients) respectively ( p =0.009). In multivariate analysis, trocar-assisted drainage was the major contributing factor for developing REPE (odds ratio=5.7, 95% confidence interval, 1.5-21). Age, gender, size of pneumothorax, symptom duration and laboratory results were similar between the groups. Conclusion Closed thoracostomy using a trocar is associated with an increased risk of REPE compared with hemostat-assisted drainage in patients with spontaneous pneumothorax.
机译:目的已经报道了引流气胸后引致再发性肺水肿(REPE)的几种危险因素,但是胸腔造瘘术与REPE发生之间的关联尚不清楚。本研究的目的是比较使用套管针或止血药辅助的封闭式胸腔穿刺术治疗自发性气胸后REPE的频率。资料和方法我们进行了一项前瞻性观察性研究,研究对象为173名自2007年1月至2008年12月就诊的自发性气胸患者。2007年,患者接受了止血剂辅助引流治疗,而2008年患者接受了套管针辅助引流治疗引流。主要结局是REPE的发展,这是在闭合胸腔造口术8小时后通过计算机X线断层摄影术确定的。使用单因素和多因素分析比较两组的结果。结果共纳入92例患者,其中止血辅助引流48例(男42例),套管针辅助引流44例(41例男)。两组的平均年龄相似(分别为24±10和26±14)。止血和套管针辅助引流后REPE的发生率分别为63%(30例患者)和86%(38例患者)(p = 0.009)。在多变量分析中,套管针引流是形成REPE的主要因素(赔率= 5.7,95%置信区间为1.5-21)。两组之间的年龄,性别,气胸大小,症状持续时间和实验室检查结果相似。结论:与止血剂辅助引流相比,自发性气胸患者使用套管针进行封闭胸腔造口术与REPE风险增加有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号