首页> 外文期刊>Dental and Medical Problems >Effectiveness of Using Self Etching Primer and Resin Modified Glass Ionomer on Bonding Orthodontic Brackets – an in Vitro Study
【24h】

Effectiveness of Using Self Etching Primer and Resin Modified Glass Ionomer on Bonding Orthodontic Brackets – an in Vitro Study

机译:使用自蚀刻底漆和树脂改性的玻璃离子聚合物粘结正畸托槽的有效性–体外研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Abstract Background . Many adhesive systems have been investigated as alternatives to conventional bonding methods. Selfetching primers and resin modified glass ionomer cement have been introduced to overcome the disadvantages of acid etching Objectives . To assess the effect of using either a self etching primer (SEP) or a resin modified glass ionomer (RMGI) on shear bond strength and failure type in comparison with conventional methods (CM). Material and Methods . Eighty metal brackets were bonded to buccal surfaces of human upper premolars by the same clinician according to 1of 4 protocols. Group 1, Transbond XT was used with self-etching primer (SEP) Transbond Plus (3M Untiek, Monrovia, Calif). Group 2, resin modified glass ionomer (RMGI) Fuji Ortho LC (GC Crop, Japan). Group 3, light cure resin (LC) Transbond XT (3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif) were used with 37% phosphoric acid. Group 4, Chemically cure resin (CC) Unite (3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif) were used with 37% phosphoric acid. The premolars were stored in distilled water for 24 hours at 4oC. Brackets were loaded to failure in Instron machine. Descriptive statistics were calculated. ANOVA, Bonferroni, Kruskal-Wallis tests and MannWhitney U were used. Results . The present study indicated that the SEP provided no significantly higher shear bond (10.01 ± 5.46 MPa) than LC adhesive (8.59 ± 4.07 MPa) while RMGI showed the lowest (5.08 MPa). A comparison of the adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores indicated that there was significantly difference between the groups with less residual adhesive remaining on the teeth with SEP and RMGI. Conclusion . SEP produced bond strength clinically accepted with less amount of residual adhesive left on the enamel while RMGI produced unacceptable bond strength. SEP can use successfully in bond orthodontic brackets.
机译:抽象背景。已经研究了许多粘合剂体系,以替代传统的粘合方法。为了克服酸蚀目的的缺点,引入了自腐蚀底漆和树脂改性玻璃离聚物胶粘剂。与传统方法(CM)相比,评估使用自蚀刻底漆(SEP)或树脂改性玻璃离聚物(RMGI)对剪切粘结强度和破坏类型的影响。材料与方法 。八名金属托槽由同一临床医生根据4个方案中的1个粘结到人上前磨牙的颊面。第1组,Transbond XT与自蚀刻底漆(SEP)Transbond Plus(3M Untiek,蒙罗维亚,加利福尼亚)一起使用。第2组,树脂改性的玻璃离聚物(RMGI),Fuji Ortho LC(日本GC Crop)。第3组,光固化树脂(LC)Transbond XT(3M Unitek,蒙罗维亚,加利福尼亚)与37%磷酸一起使用。第4组,化学固化树脂(CC)Unite(3M Unitek,蒙罗维亚,加利福尼亚)与37%磷酸一起使用。将前磨牙在4oC的蒸馏水中保存24小时。支架在Instron机器中加载失败。计算描述统计量。使用方差分析,Bonferroni,Kruskal-Wallis测试和MannWhitneyU。结果。本研究表明,SEP没有提供比LC胶粘剂(8.59±4.07 MPa)更高的剪切粘结力(10.01±5.46 MPa),而RMGI显示出最低的(5.08 MPa)。胶粘剂残余指数(ARI)得分的比较表明,两组之间存在显着差异,而SEP和RMGI残留在牙齿上的残留胶剂较少。结论。 SEP产生了临床上可接受的粘结强度,而牙釉质上残留的残留粘合剂较少,而RMGI产生了不可接受的粘结强度。 SEP可以成功地用于粘结正畸托槽。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号