• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Turkish Journal of Agriculture & Forestry >Comparison of Different Irrigation Methods Based on the Parametric Evaluation Approach
【24h】

Comparison of Different Irrigation Methods Based on the Parametric Evaluation Approach

机译：基于参数评估法的不同灌溉方式的比较

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The main objective of this research is to compare two different irrigation methods according to parametric evaluation system in the Field Plants Central Research Institute-Ikizce Research Farm's soils located in southern Ankara. Soil properties of the study area including texture, depth, EC, drainage, carbonate content and slope were derived from a detailed soil map scaled 1/5000. After analyzing and evaluating soil properties using geographic information system techniques, gravity and drop irrigation suitability maps were generated. Results showed that 13.1% of the study area was highly suitable for surface and gravity irrigation methods, whereas 51.2% of the study area was highly suitable for drop irrigation method. On the other hand, it was found that some land mapping units coded 3, 16, 18 and 19 are not suitable for both irrigation systems. As a result, drop type was suggested the best irrigation system for more than half of the study area soils due to soil and topographic conditions. This study indicates that the geographic information system (GIS) technique has an important role to determine suitability of the study area soils for both gravity and drop irrigation systems.
机译：这项研究的主要目的是根据位于安卡拉南部的田间植物中央研究所-伊基斯研究农场土壤的参数评估系统，比较两种不同的灌溉方法。研究区域的土壤特性（包括质地，深度，EC，排水，碳酸盐含量和坡度）是根据比例为1/5000的详细土壤图得出的。在使用地理信息系统技术分析和评估土壤特性后，生成了重力和滴灌适宜性地图。结果表明，研究区域的13.1％非常适合于地面灌溉和重力灌溉，而研究区域的51.2％非常适合于滴灌灌溉。另一方面，发现一些编码为3、16、18和19的土地制图单位不适用于两种灌溉系统。结果，由于土壤和地形条件，建议采用滴灌方式是研究区域一半以上土壤的最佳灌溉系统。这项研究表明，地理信息系统（GIS）技术对于确定研究区域土壤对重力灌溉系统和滴灌系统的适用性具有重要作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号