...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of athletic training >Initial Electrical Stimulation Frequency and Cramp Threshold Frequency and Force
【24h】

Initial Electrical Stimulation Frequency and Cramp Threshold Frequency and Force

机译:初始电刺激频率和蠕变阈值频率和作用力

获取原文
           

摘要

Context: In the electrically induced cramp model, the tibial nerve is stimulated at an initial frequency of 4 Hz with increases in 2-Hz increments until the flexor hallucis brevis cramps. The frequency at which cramping occurs (ie, threshold frequency [TF]) can vary considerably. A potential limitation is that multiple subthreshold stimulations before TF might induce fatigue, which is operationally defined as a decrease in maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) force, thereby biasing TF. Objective: To determine if TF is similar when initially stimulated at 4 Hz or 14 Hz and if MVIC force is different among stimulation frequencies or over time (precramp, 1 minute postcramp, and 5 minutes postcramp). Design: Crossover study. Setting: Laboratory. Patients or Other Participants: Twenty participants (13 males: age = 20.6 ± 2.9 years, height = 184.4 ± 5.7 cm, mass = 76.3 ± 7.1 kg; 7 females: age = 20.4 ± 3.5 years, height = 166.6 ± 6.0 cm, mass = 62.4 ± 10.0 kg) who were prone to cramps. Intervention(s): Participants performed 20 practice MVICs. After a 5-minute rest, three 2-second MVICs were recorded and averaged for the precramp measurement. Participants were stimulated at either 4 Hz or 14 Hz, and the frequency was increased in 2-Hz increments from each initial frequency until cramp. The MVIC force was reevaluated at 1 minute and 5 minutes postcramp. Main Outcome Measure(s): The TF and MVIC force. Results: Initial stimulation frequency did not affect TF (4 Hz = 16.2 ± 3.8 Hz, 14 Hz = 17.1 ± 5.0 Hz; t19=1.2, P = .24). Two participants had inaccurate TFs when initially stimulated at 14 Hz; they cramped at 10 and 12 Hz in the 4-Hz condition. The MVIC force did not differ between initial frequencies (F1,19 = 0.9, P = .36) but did differ over time (F2,38 = 5.1, P = .01). Force was lower at 1 minute postcramp (25.1 ± 10.1 N) than at precramp (28.7 ± 7.8 N; P .05). Conclusions: The preferred initial stimulation frequency might be 4 Hz because it did not alter or overestimate TF. The MVIC force was lower at 1 minute postcramp, suggesting the induced cramp rather than the varying electrical frequencies affected force. A 1- to 5-minute rest should be provided postcramp induction if multiple cramps are induced.
机译:背景:在电诱发的抽筋模型中,胫骨神经以4 Hz的初始频率刺激,并以2 Hz的增量增加,直到屈指缩短缩痉挛。发生抽筋的频率(即阈值频率[TF])可能会发生很大变化。潜在的局限性在于,TF之前的多个亚阈值刺激可能会引起疲劳,这在操作上被定义为最大自发等长收缩(MVIC)力的降低,从而使TF产生偏差。目的:确定在最初以4 Hz或14 Hz刺激时TF是否相似,以及刺激频率之间或随时间(收缩前,收缩后1分钟和收缩后5分钟)MVIC力是否不同。设计:交叉研究。地点:实验室。患者或其他参与者:20名参与者(13名男性:年龄= 20.6±2.9岁,身高= 184.4±5.7 cm,质量= 76.3±7.1 kg; 7名女性:年龄= 20.4±3.5岁,身高= 166.6±6.0 cm,质量= 62.4±10.0公斤),容易抽筋。干预:参与者进行了20次练习MVIC。休息5分钟后,记录3个2秒的MVIC,并将其平均以进行抽筋前的测量。以4 Hz或14 Hz刺激参与者,并且从每个初始频率直到抽筋,频率以2 Hz的增量增加。抽拉后1分钟和5分钟重新评估MVIC力。主要指标:TF和MVIC力量。结果:初始刺激频率不影响TF(4 Hz = 16.2±3.8 Hz,14 Hz = 17.1±5.0 Hz; t19 = 1.2,P = 0.24)。最初以14 Hz刺激时,两名参与者的TF不准确;在4 Hz的情况下,它们在10和12 Hz时局促。 MVIC力在初始频率之间没有差异(F1,19 = 0.9,P = .36),但随时间变化(F2,38 = 5.1,P = 0.01)。抽筋后1分钟(25.1±10.1 N)的力低于抽筋前(28.7±7.8 N; P .05)。结论:首选的初始刺激频率可能是4 Hz,因为它不会改变或高估TF。抽筋后1分钟,MVIC力较低,表明诱发抽筋,而不是变化的电频率影响力。如果诱发多次抽筋,应在抽筋后提供1至5分钟的休息时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号