...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of athletic training >Weight-Bearing Dorsiflexion Range of Motion and Landing Biomechanics in Individuals With Chronic Ankle Instability
【24h】

Weight-Bearing Dorsiflexion Range of Motion and Landing Biomechanics in Individuals With Chronic Ankle Instability

机译:慢性踝关节不稳患者的负重运动和着陆生物力学背屈范围

获取原文
           

摘要

Context: People with chronic ankle instability (CAI) exhibit less weight-bearing dorsiflexion range of motion (ROM) and less knee flexion during landing than people with stable ankles. Examining the relationship between dorsiflexion ROM and landing biomechanics may identify a modifiable factor associated with altered kinematics and kinetics during landing tasks. Objective: To examine the relationship between weight-bearing dorsiflexion ROM and single-legged landing biomechanics in persons with CAI. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Laboratory. Patients or Other Participants: Fifteen physically active persons with CAI (5 men, 10 women; age = 21.9 ± 2.1 years, height = 168.7 ± 9.0 cm, mass = 69.4 ± 13.3 kg) participated. Intervention(s): Participants performed dorsiflexion ROM and single-legged landings from a 40-cm height. Sagittal-plane kinematics of the lower extremity and ground reaction forces (GRFs) were captured during landing. Main Outcome Measure(s): Static dorsiflexion was measured using the weight-bearing–lunge test. Kinematics of the ankle, knee, and hip were observed at initial contact, maximum angle, and sagittal displacement. Sagittal displacements of the ankle, knee, and hip were summed to examine overall sagittal displacement. Kinetic variables were maximum posterior and vertical GRFs normalized to body weight. We used Pearson product moment correlations to evaluate the relationships between dorsiflexion ROM and landing biomechanics. Correlations (r) were interpreted as weak (0.00–0.40), moderate (0.41–0.69), or strong (0.70–1.00). The coefficient of determination (r2) was used to determine the amount of explained variance among variables. Results: Static dorsiflexion ROM was moderately correlated with maximum dorsiflexion (r = 0.49, r2 = 0.24), ankle displacement (r = 0.47, r2 = 0.22), and total displacement (r = 0.67, r2 = 0.45) during landing. Dorsiflexion ROM measured statically and during landing demonstrated moderate to strong correlations with maximum knee (r = 0.69–0.74, r2 = 0.47–0.55) and hip (r = 0.50–0.64, r2 = 0.25–0.40) flexion, hip (r = 0.53–0.55, r2 = 0.28–0.30) and knee (r = 0.53–0.70, r2 = 0.28–0.49) displacement, and vertical GRF (?0.47– ?0.50, r2 = 0.22–0.25). Conclusions: Dorsiflexion ROM was moderately to strongly related to sagittal-plane kinematics and maximum vertical GRF during single-legged landing in persons with CAI. Persons with less dorsiflexion ROM demonstrated a more erect landing posture and greater GRF.
机译:背景:与脚踝稳定的人相比,患有慢性脚踝不稳(CAI)的人在着陆时表现出的负重背屈运动范围(ROM)和屈膝少。检查背屈ROM与着陆生物力学之间的关系可以确定与着陆任务期间运动学和动力学变化相关的可修正因素。目的:探讨CAI患者负重背屈ROM与单腿着陆生物力学之间的关系。设计:横断面研究。地点:实验室。患者或其他参与者:15名参加CAI锻炼的人(5名男性,10名女性;年龄= 21.9±2.1岁,身高= 168.7±9.0 cm,体重= 69.4±13.3 kg)。干预:参与者进行背屈ROM和40厘米高的单腿降落。在着陆期间捕获下肢的矢状面运动学和地面反作用力(GRF)。主要观察指标:静态背屈的测量采用负重弯曲试验。在初次接触,最大角度和矢状位移时观察到踝,膝和髋的运动学。将脚踝,膝盖和臀部的矢状位移相加,以检查整体矢状位移。动力学变量是最大后验和垂直GRFs归一化为体重。我们使用Pearson产品力矩相关性来评估背屈ROM与着陆生物力学之间的关系。相关性(r)被解释为弱(0.00–0.40),中度(0.41-0.69)或强(0.70–1.00)。确定系数(r2)用于确定变量之间的解释方差量。结果:静态背屈ROM与着陆期间的最大背屈(r = 0.49,r2 = 0.24),踝关节位移(r = 0.47,r2 = 0.22)和总位移(r = 0.67,r2 = 0.45)中等相关。静态和着陆期间测量的背屈ROM与最大膝关节(r = 0.69–0.74,r2 = 0.47–0.55)和臀部(r = 0.50–0.64,r2 = 0.25–0.40)呈中等至强相关性,髋关节屈曲(r = 0.53 –0.55,r2 = 0.28–0.30)和膝盖(r = 0.53–0.70,r2 = 0.28–0.49)位移,以及垂直GRF(?0.47–?0.50,r2 = 0.22–0.25)。结论:CAI患者单腿着陆时背屈ROM与矢状面运动学和最大垂直GRF有中等程度的相关性。背屈ROM较小的人表现出更直立的着陆姿势和更大的GRF。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号