...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of athletic training >Drinking to Thirst Versus Drinking Ad Libitum During Road Cycling
【24h】

Drinking to Thirst Versus Drinking Ad Libitum During Road Cycling

机译:公路骑行时饮酒欲渴与随意饮酒

获取原文
           

摘要

Context: The sensation of thirst is different from the complex behavior of drinking ad libitum. Rehydration recommendations to athletes differ, depending on the source, yet no previous researchers have systematically compared drinking to thirst (DTT) versus ad libitum drinking behavior (DAL). Objective: To compare 2 groups of trained cyclists (DTT and DAL) who had similar physical characteristics and training programs (P > .05). The DTT group (n = 12, age = 47 ± 7 years) drank only when thirsty, whereas the DAL group (n = 12, age = 44 ± 7 years) consumed fluid ad libitum (ie, whenever and in whatever volume desired). Design: Cohort study. Setting: Road cycling (164 km) in the heat (36.1°C ± 6.5°C). Patients or Other Participants: Ultraendurance cyclists (4 women, 20 men). Intervention(s): We recorded measurements 1 day before the event, on event day before the start, at 3 roadside aid stations, at the finish line, and 1 day after the event. Main Outcome Measure(s): Body mass, urinary hydration indices, and food and fluids consumed. Results: No between-groups differences were seen on event day for total exercise time (DTT = 6.69 ± 0.89 hours, DAL = 6.66 ± 0.77 hours), urinary indices (specific gravity, color), body mass change (DTT = ?2.22% ± 1.73%, DAL = ?2.29% ± 1.62%), fluid intake (DTT = 5.63 ± 2.59 L/6.7 h, DAL = 6.04 ± 2.37 L/6.7 h), dietary energy intake, macronutrient intake, ratings of thirst (DTT start = 2 ± 1, DTT finish = 6 ± 1, DAL start = 2 ± 1, DAL finish = 6 ± 1), pain, perceived exertion, or thermal sensation. Total fluid intake on recovery day +1 was the primary significant difference (DAL = 5.13 ± 1.87 L/24 h, DTT = 3.13 ± 1.53 L/24 h, t18 = 2.59, P = .02). Conclusions: Observations on event day indicated that drinking to thirst and drinking ad libitum resulted in similar physiologic and perceptual outcomes. This suggests that specific instructions to “drink to thirst” were unnecessary. Indeed, if athletes drink ad libitum, they can focus on training and competition rather than being distracted by ongoing evaluation of thirst sensations.
机译:背景:口渴的感觉不同于随意饮酒的复杂行为。根据不同的来源,向运动员补充水分的建议也有所不同,但是以前没有研究者系统地比较过饮渴和不饮酒行为(DAL)。目的:比较两组具有相似身体特征和训练计划(P> .05)的训练有素的自行车手(DTT和DAL)。 DTT组(n = 12,年龄= 47±7岁)仅在口渴时才喝酒,而DAL组(n = 12,年龄= 44±7岁)则随意饮水(即,所需的时间和量) 。设计:队列研究。设置:在高温(36.1°C±6.5°C)下进行公路骑行(164公里)。患者或其他参与者:超耐力自行车手(4名女性,20名男性)。干预措施:我们在事件发生前1天,开始前发生事件的当天,在3个路边援助站,终点线和事件发生后1天记录了测量值。主要结果指标:体重,尿液水合指数以及食用的食物和液体。结果:活动当天的总运动时间(DTT = 6.69±0.89小时,DAL = 6.66±0.77小时),尿液指数(比重,颜色),体重变化(DTT =?2.22 )与组间无差异。 %±1.73 %,DAL =?2.29 %±1.62 %),液体摄入(DTT = 5.63±2.59 L / 6.7 h,DAL = 6.04±2.37 L / 6.7 h),饮食能量摄入,大量营养素摄入,等级口渴(DTT开始= 2±1,DTT完成= 6±1,DAL开始= 2±1,DAL完成= 6±1),疼痛,感觉到的劳累或热感。恢复第+1天的总液体摄入量是主要的显着差异(DAL = 5.13±1.87 L / 24 h,DTT = 3.13±1.53 L / 24 h,t18 = 2.59,P = .02)。结论:在活动当天的观察表明,口渴和随意饮酒会导致相似的生理和知觉结果。这表明不需要“喝到渴”的具体说明。的确,如果运动员随意喝酒,他们可以专注于训练和比赛,而不会因不断评估口感而分心。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号