...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of athletic training >Optimizing Cold-Water Immersion for Exercise-Induced Hyperthermia: An Evidence-Based Paper
【24h】

Optimizing Cold-Water Immersion for Exercise-Induced Hyperthermia: An Evidence-Based Paper

机译:运动诱发的热疗优化冷水浸泡:基于证据的论文

获取原文
           

摘要

Reference: Zhang Y, Davis JK, Casa DJ, Bishop PA. Optimizing cold water immersion for exercise-induced hyperthermia: a meta-analysis. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015;47(11):2464?2472. Clinical Questions: Do optimal procedures exist for implementing cold-water immersion (CWI) that yields high cooling rates for hyperthermic individuals? Data Sources: One reviewer performed a literature search using PubMed and Web of Science. Search phrases were cold water immersion, forearm immersion, ice bath, ice water immersion, immersion, AND cooling. Study Selection: Studies were included based on the following criteria: (1) English language, (2) full-length articles published in peer-reviewed journals, (3) healthy adults subjected to exercise-induced hyperthermia, and (4) reporting of core temperature as 1 outcome measure. A total of 19 studies were analyzed. Data Extraction: Pre-immersion core temperature, immersion water temperature, ambient temperature, immersion duration, and immersion level were coded a priori for extraction. Data originally reported in graphical form were digitally converted to numeric values. Mean differences comparing the cooling rates of CWI with passive recovery, standard deviation of change from baseline core temperature, and within-subjects r were extracted. Two independent reviewers used the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale to assess the risk of bias. Main Results: Cold-water immersion increased the cooling rate by 0.03°C/min (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.03, 0.04°C/min) compared with passive recovery. Cooling rates were more effective when the pre-immersion core temperature was ≥38.6°C (P = .023), immersion water temperature was ≤10°C (P = .036), ambient temperature was ≥20°C (P = .013), or immersion duration was ≤10 minutes (P < .001). Cooling rates for torso and limb immersion (mean difference = 0.04°C/min, 95% CI = 0.03, 0.06°C/min) were higher (P = .028) than those for forearm and hand immersion (mean difference = 0.01°C/min, 95% CI = ?0.01, 0.04°C/min). Conclusions: Hyperthermic individuals were cooled twice as fast by CWI as by passive recovery. Therefore, the former method is the preferred choice when treating patients with exertional heat stroke. Water temperature should be <10°C, with the torso and limbs immersed. Insufficient published evidence supports CWI of the forearms and hands.
机译:参考:Zhang Y,Davis JK,Casa DJ,Bishop PA。优化运动引起的体温过高的冷水浸泡:一项荟萃分析。医学科学体育锻炼。 2015; 47(11):2464?2472。临床问题:是否存在用于实施冷水浸泡(CWI)的最佳程序,该冷水浸泡对高热个体产生较高的冷却速率?数据来源:一位审阅者使用PubMed和Web of Science进行了文献检索。搜索词是冷水浸入,前臂浸入,冰浴,冰水浸入,浸入和冷却。研究选择:根据以下标准纳入研究:(1)英语;(2)在同行评审期刊上发表的全长文章;(3)健康成年人因运动引起的体温过高;以及(4)报告核心温度作为1个结果指标。总共分析了19个研究。数据提取:将浸没前的核心温度,浸没水温度,环境温度,浸没时间和浸没水平先验编码以进行提取。最初以图形形式报告的数据被数字转换为数值。提取了比较CWI与被动恢复的冷却速率,与基准核心温度变化的标准偏差以及对象内部r的均值差。两名独立审阅者使用物理疗法证据数据库(PEDro)量表评估偏倚风险。主要结果:与被动恢复相比,冷水浸泡使冷却速度提高了0.03°C / min(95%置信区间[CI] = 0.03,0.04°C / min)。当预浸芯温度≥38.6°C(P = .023),浸水温度≤10°C(P = .036),环境温度≥20°C(P =)时,冷却速率更有效。 013),或浸泡时间≤10分钟(P <.001)。躯干和肢体浸入的冷却速率(平均差异= 0.04°C / min,95%CI = 0.03,0.06°C / min)高于前臂和手浸入(平均差异= 0.01)(P = .028) °C / min,95%CI = 0.01,0.04°C / min)。结论:CWI使体温过高的人冷却的速度是被动恢复的两倍。因此,前一种方法是治疗运动性中暑患者的首选。水温应<10°C,躯干和四肢浸入水中。公开的证据不足,无法支持前臂和手的CWI。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号