...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare >Impact of Fadama III Project on the Food Security Status of Beneficiary and Non Beneficiary Farmers in Kabba/Bunu LGA, Kogi
【24h】

Impact of Fadama III Project on the Food Security Status of Beneficiary and Non Beneficiary Farmers in Kabba/Bunu LGA, Kogi

机译：Fadama III项目对科吉卡巴/布努省地方政府受益和非受益农民粮食安全状况的影响

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The study examined the impact of Fadama III project on the food security status of beneficiary and non beneficiary farmers in Kabba/Bunu LGA of Kogi state, Nigeria. A two stage sampling technique was used to select 5 villages out of the 15 villages in the area and 18 beneficiary and non beneficiary farmers from each village giving a total o 180 respondents. Generated data were subjected to descriptive statistical analysis, logistic regressions, food security index (FSI), food insecurity gap (FIG), headcount ratio (HCR) and surplus index (SI). Analysis of the socioeconomic variables revealed that most of the beneficiary farmers are within the age of 40 – 49 years while most of the non beneficiary farmers are within the age of 30 – 39 years. About 15% of the beneficiary farmers had no formal education while 46% of the non beneficiary farmers had no formal education. The crop output level of the farmers showed that beneficiary farmers had more output than the non beneficiary farmers with an output difference of 1% before fadama programme and a crop output difference was 9.5% after the project. Similarly, the farmers had 0.16% difference in their level of consumption before the fadama project and 13.9% difference in their consumption level after the project in favour of beneficiary farmers. The result further show that 75(83%) of the beneficiary farmers are food secure as against about 39(34%) of the non beneficiary farmers. The mean FSI of food secure beneficiary farmers was 3.88 while that of food secure non beneficiary farmers had 1.98. The FIG/SI of food insecure household of non beneficiary farmers and beneficiary farmers were 29% and 49% respectively. The logistic regressions analysis shows that the socioeconomic characteristics considered had significant relation with access to fadama project except age, household size and marital status that had no significant relationship. The study established that shortage of water, late supply of inputs and high fadama user group contribution were the problems associated with the project in the area. The major food insecurity coping strategies were purchasing food on credit (99%), reducing size of food per meal (89%), consuming seed stock for next season (86%), borrowing food (81%) and rationing money to buy prepared food (73%). It was therefore concluded that the level of farmer – extension contact was low, the farmers operate on a small scale level and Fadama III programme increased the crop output and consumption levels of both the beneficiary farmers and non beneficiary farmers. Based on the conclusions, it was recommended that the Agricultural Development Project (ADP) should ensure regular contacts with farmers to expose them to the benefits of Fadama farming, the ADP and the Local Agricultural Authority should help the farmers and liaise with the State Fadama office to ensure early supply of material inputs and government at the state level should ensure an alternative source of water.
机译：该研究检查了Fadama III项目对尼日利亚科吉州Kabba / Bunu LGA的受益人和非受益人农民的粮食安全状况的影响。使用了两阶段抽样技术从该地区的15个村庄中选择5个村庄，并从每个村庄中选出18个受益和非受益农民，总共有180名受访者。对生成的数据进行描述性统计分析，逻辑回归，食品安全指数（FSI），食品不安全缺口（FIG），员工人数比率（HCR）和剩余指数（SI）。对社会经济变量的分析表明，大多数受益农民的年龄在40-49岁之间，而大多数非受益农民的年龄在30-39岁之间。大约15％的受益者没有接受过正规教育，而46％的非受益者没有接受过正规教育。农民的农作物产量水平表明，受益农民比非受益农民的产量更高，在法达玛计划之前的产量差异为1％，而在项目实施之后的作物产量差异为9.5％。同样，农民在fadama项目之前的消费水平差异为0.16％，在项目之后的消费水平的差异为13.9％，受益者是农民。结果进一步表明，有75％（83％）的受益者是粮食安全者，而约39％（34％）的非受益者是粮食安全者。粮食安全受益农民的平均FSI为3.88，而粮食安全非受益农民的FSI为1.98。非受益农民和受​​益农民的粮食不安全家庭的FIG / SI分别为29％和49％。 Logistic回归分析表明，所考虑的社会经济特征与获得fadama项目有显着关系，但年龄，家庭规模和婚姻状况没有显着关系。该研究确定，该地区的项目存在水源短缺，投入物供应晚和fadama用户群体贡献高的问题。粮食不安全的主要应对策略是信贷购买粮食（99％），减少每餐食物的大小（89％），下个季节消耗种子库存（86％），借用食物（81％）并按比例分配购买准备的钱食物（73％）。因此得出的结论是，农民与推广的联系程度很低，农民的经营规模很小，Fadama III计划增加了受益农民和非受益农民的作物产量和消费水平。根据结论，建议农业发展项目（ADP）应确保与农民定期接触，使他们受益于Fadama农业，ADP和地方农业当局应帮助农民并与State Fadama办公室联络为了确保及早供应材料，州政府应确保有替代的水源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号