...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical and Experimental Investigations >Risk factors for development of complication following peripherally inserted central catheters: A retrospective analysis of 850 patients
【24h】

Risk factors for development of complication following peripherally inserted central catheters: A retrospective analysis of 850 patients

机译：外围插入中央导管后发生并发症的危险因素：850例患者的回顾性分析

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Objectives: Peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) are inserted into central veins through the upper extremity veins. In this retrospective study, we aimed to evaluate PICC procedures, related complications, their causes and factors influencing the success of the procedure during anaesthesiaMethods: ‘Central Venous Catheterization Forms’ filled out for 850 patients in whom a PICC was inserted by residents during general anaesthesia between November 2009 and March 2013 in the operating room of Uludag University Medical Faculty Hospital were retrospectively analysed.Results: A total of 1174 procedures were evaluated. The most preferred vein for the first attempt was the right basilic vein (32.7%). Difficulty (more than two attempts) with the PICC procedure was correlated with the patient’s age (p30 kg/m2 (pConclusion: We conclude that catheterization should be performed under the surveillance of a staff keeping in mind the risks of complications. In the case of failure following 2 attempts, the procedure should be handed over to a more experienced staff member
机译：目的：周围插入的中心静脉导管（PICC）通过上肢静脉插入中心静脉。在这项回顾性研究中，我们旨在评估PICC程序，相关并发症，其在麻醉期间影响该程序成功的因素和方法。方法：为850例在全麻期间由居民插入PICC的患者填写了``中央静脉导管形成表''方法：回顾性分析2009年11月至2013年3月在乌鲁达大学医学院附属医院手术室工作的临床资料。结果：共评估了1174项手术。第一次尝试最优选的静脉是右基底静脉（32.7％）。 PICC手术的困难（两次以上尝试）与患者的年龄（p30 kg / m2）相关（p结论：我们得出结论，导管插入术应在工作人员的监督下进行，并要注意并发症的风险。 2次尝试失败后，应将程序移交给经验更丰富的工作人员

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号