首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Community Informatics >Participant-Making: bridging the gulf between community knowledge and academic research
【24h】

Participant-Making: bridging the gulf between community knowledge and academic research

机译:参与者参与:弥合社区知识与学术研究之间的鸿沟

获取原文
           

摘要

Too often in social research for design, academic knowledge is privileged at the expense of other knowledge and ways of knowing, although by overlooking insights from other participants this academic meaning-making may be wasteful and/or damaging to relations. In this paper, we describe a project that focuses on establishing academic/community relations to look at how knowledge issues are handled in setting up participative projects. We touch on the ethics of the ‘informed consent’ required for the ethics approval process and that of generating and sharing project outcomes in a way that reflects team membership, considering how to share credit, encourage diverse opinion and ensure some value in participating for all participants. Since a key outcome of the study is intended to be policy recommendations as to how to involve community groups in research projects, we take a highly reflexive approach. We reflect here on how we, as academic researchers, became participants and what we made available to our partners in research to do the same.
机译:在社会研究中,设计知识常常以牺牲其他知识和知识的方式为代价而享有特权,尽管通过忽略其他参与者的见解,这种学术意义的形成可能是浪费和/或破坏关系的。在本文中,我们描述了一个专注于建立学术/社区关系的项目,以研究在建立参与性项目中如何处理知识问题。我们触及道德审批流程所需的“知情同意”道德,并以反映团队成员身份的方式生成和共享项目成果,考虑如何分享信用,鼓励不同意见并确保参与所有人的价值参加者。由于研究的主要结果旨在作为有关如何使社区团体参与研究项目的政策建议,因此我们采用高度反思的方法。我们在这里反思我们作为学术研究人员如何成为参与者,以及我们为研究中的合作伙伴提供的服务。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号