...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Chinese Sociology >Global market and income gaps between industries: evidence from finance industry and manufacturing industry
【24h】

Global market and income gaps between industries: evidence from finance industry and manufacturing industry

机译:全球市场和行业之间的收入差距:来自金融业和制造业的证据

获取原文
           

摘要

The income gap among industries in China is usually explained by the theory of segmented labor market. However, this perspective cannot explain why the finance industry has the highest average income among the monopoly industries, while the manufacturing industry has much lower incomes than any other competitive industry. This paper argues that it can be explained by the way China participates in the economic globalization. Liberalization of the manufacturing industry and protection of the finance industry are China’s strategies in dealing with opportunities and challenges of economic globalization. This paper compares the average incomes of monopoly and competitive industries, as well as that of finance and manufacturing. Analyses of panel data spanning from 2000 to 2014 show that the bigger the size of foreign trade, the higher the average income of the finance industry, and the lower the average income of the whole monody industries; at the same time, FDI reduces the average income of the manufacturing industry. This research advances the literature of segmented labor market by pointing out that income inequality between industries in China should be understood in the context of economic globalization.
机译:中国行业间的收入差距通常由劳动力市场分割理论来解释。但是,这种观点无法解释为什么金融业的平均收入在垄断行业中最高,而制造业的收入却比其他竞争性行业低得多。本文认为,可以用中国参与经济全球化的方式来解释。制造业自由化和金融业保护是中国应对经济全球化机遇与挑战的战略。本文比较了垄断和竞争性行业以及金融和制造业的平均收入。从2000年至2014年的面板数据分析表明,外贸规模越大,金融业的平均收入就越高,整个单体产业的平均收入就越低;同时,外国直接投资减少了制造业的平均收入。该研究指出应该在经济全球化的背景下理解中国各行业之间的收入不平等,从而推动了劳动力市场分割的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号