首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management >The gains and losses of collusion: An empirical research on the market behaviors of China’s power enterprises
【24h】

The gains and losses of collusion: An empirical research on the market behaviors of China’s power enterprises

机译:共谋的得失:中国电力企业市场行为的实证研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: Collusion is a common behavior of oligarch enterprises aiming to get an advantage in market competition. The purpose of the thesis is to use the empirical research methods to explore positive or negative effects that the electricity generation manufacturers’ collusion has caused at the macro level of Market Economy and the micro level of enterprises’ behaviors. Design/methodology/approach: The designed research model in the thesis is an extension of Porter’s model (Porter, 1984). It applies a more advanced measurement method, FIML. In the example of price bidding project that started by electricity generation enterprises of China’s power industry, the thesis analyzes the relevant price data of subordinate power plants of China’s five power generation groups in pilots of price bidding Policy. Findings: It is found in the thesis that power generation enterprises are facing collusion issues in the market. To be exact, it is such a situation in which non-cooperative competition and collusion alternate. Under the competition, market is relatively steady, thus forming a lower network price. It is helpful to the development of the whole industry. However, once Cartel is formed, the price will rise and clash with power enterprises and transmission-distribution companies concerning the interests conflicts. At the same time, a higher power price will form in the market, making consumers suffer losses. All of these are bad for industry development. Not only the collusion of power enterprises affects power price but also the market power that caused by long-time Cartel will reduce the market entrant in electricity generation. Market resources are centralized in the hands of Cartel, causing a low effective competition in the market, which has passive effects on users. Implications: The empirical research also indicates that collusion undoubtedly benefits the power enterprises that involved. As a cooperation pattern, collusion can lead to the synergy between relevant companies. However, collusion harms the benefits of other market entities. During the process of enterprises creating common interests cooperatively, collusion may bring harm to the outside industry. Originality/value: According to the empirical research method, the thesis takes China’s power industry for example to carry out research and show the gains and losses of collusion from two levels, namely market economy level and management level.
机译:目的:合谋是寡头企业旨在在市场竞争中获得优势的普遍行为。本文的目的是运用实证研究方法,探讨在市场经济的宏观层面和企业行为的微观层面上,发电制造商合谋所产生的正面或负面影响。设计/方法/方法:论文中设计的研究模型是Porter模型的扩展(Porter,1984年)。它采用了更高级的测量方法FIML。以中国电力行业发电企业启动的电价竞标项目为例,本文在电价竞标政策试点中,分析了中国五个发电集团下属电厂的相关电价数据。调查结果:论文发现发电企业在市场中面临合谋问题。确切地说,就是非合作竞争和串通交替出现的情况。在竞争下,市场相对稳定,从而形成较低的网络价格。这对整个行业的发展有帮助。但是,一旦卡特尔成立,价格就会上涨,并在利益冲突方面与电力企业和输配电公司发生冲突。同时,市场上将形成更高的电价,使消费者蒙受损失。所有这些都不利于产业发展。电力企业的合谋不仅影响电价,而且卡特尔长期任职造成的市场力量也会减少发电的市场参与者。市场资源集中在卡特尔手中,导致市场上的有效竞争较低,对用户产生被动影响。启示:实证研究还表明,合谋无疑使所涉电力企业受益。作为一种合作模式,合谋可以导致相关公司之间的协同作用。但是,串通会损害其他市场实体的利益。企业在合作创造共同利益的过程中,串通可能对外部产业造成损害。独创性/价值:根据实证研究方法,本文以中国电力行业为例进行研究,从市场经济水平和管理水平两个层次显示合谋的得失。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号