...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization >Development Initiatives and the Viable Procedural Reforms in the Dispute Settlement System in Response to the Special Needs of Developing Countries
【24h】

Development Initiatives and the Viable Procedural Reforms in the Dispute Settlement System in Response to the Special Needs of Developing Countries

机译:针对发展中国家特殊需要的争端解决系统中的发展举措和可行的程序改革

获取原文
           

摘要

International trade relations are now more legalised under the World Trade Organization (WTO) than under the former international trade system created pursuant to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). The Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) of the WTO clearly represents a shift toward a rule-oriented, legalistic and adjudicative approach, which is intended to enhance the status of, and confidence in the WTO dispute settlement system. The approach is likely to ensure greater stability and predictability in the system by encouraging precise decisions on the merits of disputes and discouraging infractions. This paper illustrates the lack of clear procedures to support the application of the provisions of the Special Differential Treatment (SDT) and the ultimate failure by the System to regulate the behavior of the Developed Countries as they relate with the Developing Countries (DCs). The paper will also present some of the reforms that can be included to enhance the ability of the Developing Countries (DCs) to rely on the provisions laid out in the DSU. This will be achieved by emphasising on proper guidelines that will assist in clarifying the same. Among these reforms discussed are the consultation processes, participation of third world countries, cost effectiveness that also includes timing and the panel/ Appellate Body (AB) processes. Key words: Reforms, Dispute Settlement System, World Trade Organization, Procedures.
机译:与根据《关税与贸易总协定》(GATT)建立的前国际贸易体系相比,世界贸易组织(WTO)现在使国际贸易关系更加合法。 WTO的争端解决谅解(DSU)显然代表了向以规则为导向,法律主义和裁决性方法的转变,该方法旨在增强WTO争端解决系统的地位和信心。通过鼓励对争议的优劣做出准确的决定并阻止违规行为,该方法可能确保系统的更大稳定性和可预测性。本文说明了缺乏明确的程序来支持特殊差别待遇(SDT)条款的应用,以及该制度最终未能规范发达国家与发展中国家(DC)相关的行为。本文还将介绍一些可包括在内的改革,以增强发展中国家(DC)依赖DSU规定的能力。这将通过强调适当的准则来实现,以帮助阐明这些准则。讨论的这些改革包括磋商程序,第三世界国家的参与,成本效益,其中还包括时间安排和小组/上诉机构(AB)程序。关键词:改革,争端解决制度,世界贸易组织,程序。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号