...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization >Division of Powers Between Corporate Organs in Public Companies: A Comparative Perspective
【24h】

Division of Powers Between Corporate Organs in Public Companies: A Comparative Perspective

机译：上市公司法人机构之间的分权比较

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

An incorporated company has neither body nor mind of its own. It can only exercise such powers as it possesses through the directors and other organs empowered by the articles to act on its behalf. This paper examines the division of powers between corporate organs in public companies in three jurisdictions, namely, Nigeria, the United States of America and Germany. It states that the German model has marked differences from the Nigerian and American models. It concludes that German corporation law shows more concern for workers as the principle of codetermination demonstrates. However, the management board which is the organ responsible for formulating corporate policy and transacting corporate business is responsible only to a supervisory board rather than to account directly to the shareholders for its conduct as in Nigeria and the United States. It suggests more participation of shareholders and workers in corporate governance in Nigeria.
机译：股份公司既没有自己的身体也没有头脑。它只能通过董事和本章程授权的其他机关行使其代表其行事的权力。本文研究了尼日利亚，美利坚合众国和德国三个司法管辖区的上市公司的法人机构之间的权力分配。它指出，德国模式与尼日利亚模式和美国模式存在显着差异。结论是，正如共同决定原则所表明的那样，德国公司法对工人的关注更多。但是，管理委员会是负责制定公司政策和处理公司业务的机构，它仅对监事会负责，而不是像在尼日利亚和美国那样直接向股东负责。它表明在尼日利亚，股东和工人更多地参与公司治理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号