...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication >Liberation through Cooperation: How Library Publishing Can Save Scholarly Journals from Neoliberalism
【24h】

Liberation through Cooperation: How Library Publishing Can Save Scholarly Journals from Neoliberalism

机译：通过合作解放：图书馆出版如何使学术期刊摆脱新自由主义

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This commentary examines political and economic aspects of open access (OA) and scholarly journal publishing. Through a discourse of critique, neoliberalism is analyzed as an ideology causing many problems in the scholarly journal publishing industry, including the serials crisis. Two major efforts in the open access movement that promote an increase in OA funded by article-processing charges (APC)—the Open Access 2020 (OA2020) and Pay It Forward (PIF) initiatives—are critiqued as neoliberal frameworks that would perpetuate existing systems of domination and exploitation. In a discourse of possibility, ways of building a post-neoliberal system of journal publishing using new tactics and strategies, merging theory and praxis, and grounding in solidarity and cooperation are presented. This includes organizing journal publishing democratically using cooperatives, which could decommodify knowledge and provide greater open access. The article concludes with a vision for a New Fair Deal, which would revolutionize the system of scholarly journal publishing by transitioning journals to library publishing cooperatives.
机译：该评论探讨了开放获取（OA）和学术期刊出版的政治和经济方面。通过评论，新自由主义被分析为一种意识形态，在学术期刊出版行业引起了许多问题，包括连续出版物危机。在开放获取运动中，由物品处理费（APC）资助促进OA增长的两项主要努力被称为“开放获取2020（OA2020）”和“向前付款”（PIF）计划，被认为是将使现有系统永存的新自由主义框架。统治和剥削。在一种可能性的讨论中，提出了使用新的策略和策略，理论与实践的融合以及团结与合作的基础来构建期刊出版后的新闻出版系统的方法。这包括使用合作社民主地组织期刊出版，这可能会使知识贬低，并提供更大的开放性。本文以实现“新公平交易”的愿景作为结束，该交易将通过将期刊过渡到图书馆出版合作社而彻底改变学术期刊出版系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号