...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication >Addressing Faculty Publishing Concerns with Open Access Journal Quality Indicators
【24h】

Addressing Faculty Publishing Concerns with Open Access Journal Quality Indicators

机译:使用开放获取期刊质量指标解决教师出版问题

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND The scholarly publishing paradigm is evolving to embrace innovative open access publication models. While this environment fosters the creation of high-quality, peer-reviewed open access publications, it also provides opportunities for journals or publishers to engage in unprofessional or unethical practices. LITERATURE REVIEW Faculty take into account a number of factors in deciding where to publish, including whether or not a journal engages in ethical publishing practices. Librarians and scholars have attempted to address this issue in a number of ways, such as generating lists of ethical/unethical publishers and general guides. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT In response to growing faculty concern in this area, the Grand Valley State University Libraries developed and evaluated a set of Open Access Journal Quality Indicators that support faculty in their effort to identify the characteristics of ethical and unethical open access publications. NEXT STEPS Liaison librarians have already begun using the Indicators as a catalyst in sparking conversation around open access publishing and scholarship. Going forward, the Libraries will continue to evaluate and gather feedback on the Indicators, taking into account emerging trends and practices.
机译:背景技术学术出版范例正在发展以拥抱创新的开放获取出版模型。这种环境促进了创建高质量的,经过同行评审的开放获取出版物,但同时也为期刊或出版商提供了从事非专业或不道德做法的机会。文学评论教师在决定在何处发表时会考虑许多因素,包括期刊是否从事道德出版实践。图书馆员和学者已尝试以多种方式解决此问题,例如生成道德/不道德出版者清单和一般指南。项目描述为了响应教师在该领域日益增长的关注,大谷州立大学图书馆开发并评估了一套开放获取期刊质量指标,这些指标支持教师努力确定符合道德和不道德标准的开放获取出版物的特征。下一步联络图书馆员已经开始使用指标作为引发有关开放获取出版和奖学金的对话的催化剂。展望未来,图书馆将考虑新兴趋势和实践,继续评估并收集有关指标的反馈。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号