...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication >A Current Snapshot of Institutional Repositories: Growth Rate, Disciplinary Content and Faculty Contributions
【24h】

A Current Snapshot of Institutional Repositories: Growth Rate, Disciplinary Content and Faculty Contributions

机译:机构存储库的当前快照:增长率,学科内容和教师贡献

获取原文
           

摘要

INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study was to examine current institutional repository (IR) content in order to assess the growth and breadth of content as it reflects faculty participation, and to identify successful strategies for increasing that participation. Previous studies have shown that faculty-initiated submissions to IRs, no matter the platform, are uncommon. Repository managers employ a variety of methods to solicit and facilitate faculty participation, including a variety of print marketing tools, presentations, and one-on-one consultations. METHODS This mixed method study examined faculty content in IRs through both a quantitative analysis of repository content and growth rate and a qualitative survey of repository administrators. Repositories using the Digital Commons repository platform, hosted by Berkeley Electronic Press, were examined in the fall and winter of 2013-2014 to assess the disciplinary scope of faculty content ( n =107) and to measure the growth rate of IR content ( n =203). Repository administrators at 205 institutions were surveyed to investigate what methods they used to facilitate faculty participation and their perceptions about the effectiveness of these methods. RESULTS Mean and median growth rates of IRs have increased since measured in 2007, with variance depending upon size and type of academic institution and age of the IR. Disciplinary content in IRs is unevenly distributed, with the Sciences predominantly represented. IR administrators remain actively involved in the submission process and in the promotion of their IRs. Personal contact with individuals or groups of faculty is the most used and successful interaction method. CONCLUSION Though IR growth rate has increased, the growth is not consistent across all IRs and does not yet pose a challenge to traditional models of scholarly publication. The rising amount of faculty content in IRs indicates faculty are increasingly willing to participate in the IR movement. However, faculty involvement may be more passive than active.
机译:引言这项研究的目的是检查当前机构知识库(IR)的内容,以便评估内容的增长和广度,因为它反映了教师的参与,并确定了增加这种参与的成功策略。先前的研究表明,无论平台如何,教师发起向IR提交的情况都是罕见的。知识库管理员采用多种方法来招揽和促进教师的参与,包括多种印刷营销工具,演示文稿和一对一咨询。方法此混合方法研究通过对存储库内容和增长率的定量分析以及对存储库管理员的定性调查,检查了IR中的教师内容。在2013年至2014年秋冬季期间,对由伯克利电子出版社(Berkeley Electronic Press)托管的使用Digital Commons存储库平台的存储库进行了检查,以评估教师内容的学科范围(n = 107)并测量IR内容的增长率(n = 203)。对205个机构的存储库管理员进行了调查,以调查他们用于促进教师参与的方法以及他们对这些方法的有效性的看法。结果自2007年以来,IR的平均增长率和中位数增长率有所提高,其变化取决于学术机构的规模和类型以及IR的年龄。投资者关系中的学科内容分布不均,其中以科学为代表。 IR管理员继续积极参与提交过程和IR的推广。与个人或教师群体的个人接触是最常用和成功的互动方式。结论尽管投资者关系的增长率有所提高,但并非所有投资者关系的增长都是一致的,并且尚未对传统的学术出版模式构成挑战。 IR中教师人数的增加表明教师越来越愿意参加IR运动。但是,教师的参与可能比主动更被动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号